May 2008
Volume 8, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Why do we see some surfaces as reflective?
Author Affiliations
  • Andrey DelPozo
    Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Silvio Savarese
    Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Derek Baker
    Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Daniel J. Simons
    Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Journal of Vision May 2008, Vol.8, 338. doi:10.1167/8.6.338
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Andrey DelPozo, Silvio Savarese, Derek Baker, Daniel J. Simons; Why do we see some surfaces as reflective?. Journal of Vision 2008;8(6):338. doi: 10.1167/8.6.338.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Why do we see the surface of a polished car as a specular reflection of the surrounding environment rather than as a texture property of the car itself? In addition to highlights, other surface properties might contribute to perceived specularity. This study explores whether deformations of the reflected scene and the nature of the scene itself contribute to perceived specularity. Human observers viewed pairs of images of mirrored surfaces reflecting different surrounding environments and judged which image was more specular. We used a CAD package to render images of mirror-like objects reflecting a range of surrounding scenes. The objects were composed of shape primitives and the scenes were either real-world or synthetic environments (e.g., ellipses on the hemisphere). Surprisingly, objects reflecting artificial environments produced a much weaker impression of specularity than did those reflecting natural environments - reflected synthetic environments were more likely to be seen as the surface texture. Critically, the nature and magnitude of the deformation of the reflected environment was virtually identical across synthetic and natural scenes. Additional experiments showed that the phase component of the spectral decomposition of the scene plays an important role: reflections of a phase-randomized scene (using an algorithm based on RISE) weakened perceived specularity. Phase randomization weakens the spatial structure of scene, further suggesting that deformation cues based on reflected scene structure affect specularity perception. Yet reflections of phase randomized scenes were still seen as more specular than reflections of synthetic environments. All this suggests that the perception of specularity is strongly affected by the statistics of the surrounding environment - natural statistics yield a stronger impression of specularity. Thus, deformations acting on the reflected scene appear to be a necessary but not sufficient cue.

DelPozo, A. Savarese, S. Baker, D. Simons, D. J. (2008). Why do we see some surfaces as reflective? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):338, 338a, http://journalofvision.org/8/6/338/, doi:10.1167/8.6.338. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×