May 2008
Volume 8, Issue 6
Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Eccentric features integrate slowly
Author Affiliations
  • Alissa R. Cantone
    Psychology and Neuroscience, New York University
  • Katharine A. Tillman
    Psychology and Neuroscience, New York University
  • Denis G. Pelli
    Psychology and Neuroscience, New York University
Journal of Vision May 2008, Vol.8, 653. doi:10.1167/8.6.653
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alissa R. Cantone, Katharine A. Tillman, Denis G. Pelli; Eccentric features integrate slowly. Journal of Vision 2008;8(6):653. doi: 10.1167/8.6.653.

      Download citation file:

      © 2015 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

  • Supplements

We read more slowly in the periphery, even though speed of information processing is faster there (Carrasco et al., 2003, Nature Neuroscience). At an eccentricity of 15 degrees, we read more slowly by a factor of 3.5. We get slower as eccentricity increases, even when the stimuli are presented at optimal print size and spacing at each eccentricity. Why is peripheral reading slower? In this study, we minimize the need for eye movements by using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation (RSVP). We measure “reading” rates for stimuli of various complexities — words (in context), 26 letters, two letters, and gratings (of two different orientations) — presented at eccentricities of 0 and 15 degrees. A stream of six items is presented at a variable rate and the reader names the items at leisure. The QUEST staircase procedure homes in on the threshold presentation rate for 80% accuracy. We find that the eccentricity effect (the ratio of “reading” rates at 0 and 15 degrees) is 3.5 for words (in context), 3 for 26 letters, 1.5 for two letters, and 1 (no eccentricity effect) for gratings. The eccentricity effect decreases with decreasing complexity (fewer features required), and it disappears when reading becomes a one-feature task. No integration is needed when a single feature suffices to distinguish the two items. Slower feature integration impairs peripheral reading.

Cantone, A. R. Tillman, K. A. Pelli, D. G. (2008). Eccentric features integrate slowly [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):653, 653a,, doi:10.1167/8.6.653. [CrossRef]
© 2008 ARVO

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.