May 2008
Volume 8, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Multiple fixations do not enhance spatial memory for scene layout
Author Affiliations
  • Kristin Michod
    University of Delaware
  • Christopher Dickinson
    University of Delaware
  • Helene Intraub
    University of Delaware
Journal of Vision May 2008, Vol.8, 740. doi:10.1167/8.6.740
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kristin Michod, Christopher Dickinson, Helene Intraub; Multiple fixations do not enhance spatial memory for scene layout. Journal of Vision 2008;8(6):740. doi: 10.1167/8.6.740.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Memory for a view of a scene tends to include surrounding layout that was never presented (i.e. boundary extension; BE). In previous research, providing prior knowledge that memory for the view's expanse would be tested, did not eliminate BE, but did attenuate it (Intraub & Bodamer, 1993). Why? Prior test knowledge might have caused an increase in fixations to regions near the picture's boundaries, thus enhancing representation of peripheral layout. To test this, we presented 12 close-up photographs for 4 s each (allowing multiple fixations) or 250 ms each (preventing multiple fixations). SOA was held constant at 5 s by interspersing a mask between pictures. Stimulus duration was crossed with test instruction. All observers (N = 144) were instructed to remember objects and backgrounds for a “memory test”; what differed was whether the specific test instruction preceded (test-informed groups) or followed (test-naïve groups) the sequence. At test, the same 12 pictures were presented again and rated on a 5-pt scale (“much-closer [−2]”, “slightly-closer [−1]”, “same [0]”, “slightly-wider [1]” or “much-wider [2]”). As expected, in the 4-s condition BE occurred in both instruction conditions but was greater in the test-naïve group (M = −.39) than the test-informed group (M = −.22). However, this was also the case when duration was only 250 ms (test naïve: M = −.37; test-informed: M = −.28). An ANOVA revealed a main effect of instruction F (1,140) = 5.5, p[[lt]].03, no effect of duration, F[[lt]]1 and no interaction, F[[lt]]1. Surprisingly multiple fixations did not affect memory for the layout's expanse. Given only a single fixation, the representation of layout also expanded beyond its physical limits, and was similarly moderated by prior knowledge of the test. Thus, BE attenuation appears to draw on a global process, rather than an increase in high acuity sampling.

Michod, K. Dickinson, C. Intraub, H. (2008). Multiple fixations do not enhance spatial memory for scene layout [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):740, 740a, http://journalofvision.org/8/6/740/, doi:10.1167/8.6.740. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 NIMH Grant RO1MH54688.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×