May 2008
Volume 8, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
Comparison of rope-pulling and blindwalking as measures of perceived egocentric distance
Author Affiliations
  • Adam J. Woods
    Department of Psychology, The George Washington University
  • John Philbeck
    Department of Psychology, The George Washington University
Journal of Vision May 2008, Vol.8, 753. doi:10.1167/8.6.753
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Adam J. Woods, John Philbeck; Comparison of rope-pulling and blindwalking as measures of perceived egocentric distance. Journal of Vision 2008;8(6):753. doi: 10.1167/8.6.753.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Pulling a length of rope between the hands could potentially be used to indicate the perceived distance of objects. Like blindwalking, this response requires integration of body motion between limbs, but unlike blindwalking, it does not require locomotor ability or updating changes in one's location into a representation of the environment. These differences make rope-pulling an attractive alternative for measuring distance perception (e.g., in brain-injured patients, or when holding vestibular cues constant is of interest). Here, we assessed whether rope-pulling is indeed responsive to perceived distance by observing whether it shows a similar pattern of errors as blindwalking when egocentric distance cues are removed. Participants (n=13) previewed targets in 3 viewing conditions: (1) Full Cue: binocular viewing of ground-level targets in a well-lit room. (2) Floor Occlusion: monocular viewing of ground-level targets under low lighting conditions. A box occluded the nearby ground-plane. (3) Reduced Cue: monocular viewing of glowing eye-level targets in an otherwise dark room. Targets were placed at 2.5, 3.5, 4.9, or 6.9 m. After viewing the target, participants donned a blindfold and indicated target distance by: (1) blindwalking to the previously viewed target location or (2) pulling a rope hand over hand to match the perceived target distance. Responses using the two behaviors were highly correlated. More importantly, a nearly unchanging relationship existed between the two behaviors as distance cues varied. One-way ANOVA on the slopes and intercepts of the best-fitting lines relating walking to rope-pulling showed no significant differences between viewing conditions (slopes: F[2,36] = 0.08, p = 0.9; intercepts: F[2,36] = 0.19, p = 0.8). Thus, we found no indication that rope-pulling and blindwalking are controlled by distinct representations. Given previous evidence that blindwalking is controlled by perception (Philbeck & Loomis, 1997), we conclude that rope-pulling is, as well.

Woods, A. J. Philbeck, J. (2008). Comparison of rope-pulling and blindwalking as measures of perceived egocentric distance [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):753, 753a, http://journalofvision.org/8/6/753/, doi:10.1167/8.6.753. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Research was funded by NIH R01 NS052137-03 and a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×