May 2008
Volume 8, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
An after-effect of perceived length
Author Affiliations
  • Frederick Kingdom
    McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University
  • Roger Watt
    Department of Psychology, University of Stirling
Journal of Vision May 2008, Vol.8, 937. doi:10.1167/8.6.937
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Frederick Kingdom, Roger Watt; An after-effect of perceived length. Journal of Vision 2008;8(6):937. doi: 10.1167/8.6.937.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Aim. Both single-unit recording studies in V1 and psychophysical studies have revealed orientation-selective mechanisms whose length selectivity is partially separable from their width or spatial frequency selectivity. This suggests that length might be a spatial dimension coded early in vision. If so, one would expect line length to be adaptable, with adaptation producing shifts in the perceived length of subsequently presented lines. Method. Subjects adapted to horizontal d.c.-balanced lines of various lengths, presented either singly or in grids. After adaptation, the perceived length of horizontal test lines that were either shorter or longer than the adaptors was measured using a conventional staircase procedure. To test whether any after-effect of perceived length was a manifestation of the well-known size or spatial-frequency after-effect, we also used vertically-oriented square-wave grating adaptors whose bars were equal in width to the length of the adaptor lines. Results. Adaptation to line length made shorter lines appear shorter and longer lines appear longer, analogous to the repulsion effects found with other spatial dimensions such as orientation and spatial frequency. With square-wave grating adaptors however, the after-effect was much smaller. Conclusion. Line length is an adaptable dimension and the resulting line-length after-effect is not simply a manifestation of the size or spatial-frequency after-effect. Line length appears to be a spatial dimension that is likely coded through the population response of neurons tuned to similar widths but different lengths.

Kingdom, F. Watt, R. (2008). An after-effect of perceived length [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):937, 937a, http://journalofvision.org/8/6/937/, doi:10.1167/8.6.937. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Funded by a Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (Canada) grant given to FK.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×