May 2008
Volume 8, Issue 6
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   May 2008
The effect of a top-down cue on spread attention in the macaque
Author Affiliations
  • Fabrice Arcizet
    Dept of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
  • James Bisley
    Dept of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, and Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
Journal of Vision May 2008, Vol.8, 990. doi:10.1167/8.6.990
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Fabrice Arcizet, James Bisley; The effect of a top-down cue on spread attention in the macaque. Journal of Vision 2008;8(6):990. doi: 10.1167/8.6.990.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Attention can be allocated to different regions of the visual scene according to the attentional priority of the objects in the scene. These priorities are represented by activity in the priority map in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP). In this study, we are interested in understanding how the brain focuses or spreads attention. To examine this, we trained two monkeys to perform a change blindness task. A trial started when the monkey fixated a central white spot during a delay of 1100 ms. Then, a combination of 1, 2, 4 or 8 oriented bars was flashed for 500 ms at equal eccentricities. After a gap of 50–150 ms, the bars reappeared for 1000 ms. In some trials, one of the bars was rotated 90 deg when it reappeared. The monkey had to saccade to this bar within 600 ms to be rewarded. In the remaining trials, no bar was rotated and the monkey was rewarded for maintaining fixation. The behavioral performance was recorded in term of the percentage of correct responses. Both monkeys showed a decrease in performance according to the number of distractors, suggesting that attention was spread and that the amount of attention at a location decreased as the number of bars increased. In another block of trials, to implement top-down attention, only 1 of the 8 stimulus locations could have the rotating stimulus — the stimuli in the 7 remaining locations will not rotate for the entire block. The addition of top-down attention increased performances indicating that attention is focused to this location. However, performance with top-down attention was worse than performance when only 1 stimulus was presented, suggesting that the presence of distractors limits the amount of attention and that the distractors are not completely suppressed on the priority map.

Arcizet, F. Bisley, J. (2008). The effect of a top-down cue on spread attention in the macaque [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 8(6):990, 990a, http://journalofvision.org/8/6/990/, doi:10.1167/8.6.990. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 This research is supported by the Kirchgessner Foundation, the Gerald Oppenheimer Family Foundation, a Klingenstein Fellowship Award in the Neurosciences and an Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Research Fellowship.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×