August 2010
Volume 10, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2010
No pain no gain: Assessment of the grasp penalty function
Author Affiliations
  • Urs Kleinholdermann
    Department of Experimental Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen
  • Volker H. Franz
    Department of Experimental Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen
  • Laurence T. Maloney
    Psychology & Neural Science, New York University
Journal of Vision August 2010, Vol.10, 1083. doi:10.1167/10.7.1083
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Urs Kleinholdermann, Volker H. Franz, Laurence T. Maloney; No pain no gain: Assessment of the grasp penalty function. Journal of Vision 2010;10(7):1083. doi: 10.1167/10.7.1083.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: In experiments where the outcome of movements result in explicit monetary rewards and penalties, subjects typically plan movements that come close to maximizing their expected gain. But what if an economically optimal movement proves to be intrinsically stressful to the organism? Would subjects trade gain to avoid pain? And if they did so, how would they price biomechanical discomfort in monetary terms? We tested how degree of discomfort affected movement planning in a simple grasping task.

Methods: Subjects attempted to rapidly grasp circular disks (50 mm diameter, 10 mm high). The edge of each disk was marked with two reward regions symmetrically-placed on the circumference. If the thumb and forefinger contact points both fell within the reward regions the subject received a monetary reward and otherwise a penalty. A grasp aimed at the centers of the reward regions would maximize expected reward but such a grasp varied in comfort with rotation angle. From trial to trial we rotated the reward regions, forcing the subject to trade off comfort and expected gain. In one condition (“narrow”) the reward regions spanned 40 degrees, in a second 60 degrees (“wide”). Deviating from the center was potentially more costly to the subject in the narrow than in the wide condition.

Results: Participants systematically traded a portion of their potential gain to achieve a more comfortable grasp position. The relationship can be described by a monotonic function of wrist rotation angle. This interrelation implies that biomechanical constraints may have a direct influence on the estimated usefulness of a movement. Our findings demonstrate that the motor system includes biomechanical comfort as one factor component of planning movements that maximize expected gain.

Kleinholdermann, U. Franz, V. H. Maloney, L. T. (2010). No pain no gain: Assessment of the grasp penalty function [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 10(7):1083, 1083a, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/7/1083, doi:10.1167/10.7.1083. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Graduateschool NeuroAct [UK] Research unit DFG/FOR 560 ‘Perception and Action’ [UK] grant DFG/FR 2100/1-3 [VHF] Humboldt Stiftung [LTM].
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×