August 2010
Volume 10, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2010
Adaptive Sequencing in Perceptual Learning
Author Affiliations
  • Everett Mettler
    University of California, Los Angeles
  • Philip Kellman
    University of California, Los Angeles
Journal of Vision August 2010, Vol.10, 1098. doi:10.1167/10.7.1098
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Everett Mettler, Philip Kellman; Adaptive Sequencing in Perceptual Learning. Journal of Vision 2010;10(7):1098. doi: 10.1167/10.7.1098.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Question: In real-world perceptual learning (PL) tasks learners come to extract distinguishing features of categories, enabling transfer to novel instances. This kind of learning can be accelerated by structured interventions involving a series of classification trials (e.g., Kellman, Massey & Son, 2009, TopiCS in Cognitive Science). Little is known about practice schedules that optimize PL, nor their relation to laws of learning for factual items. Method: We tested an adaptive sequencing algorithm for PL that arranged spacing for categories as a function of the individual learner's trial-by-trial accuracy and reaction time. Participants learned to classify images from 12 butterfly genera. Each genus contained 9 exemplars from 3 species (Experiment 1) or 9 exemplars from 1 species (Experiment 2 - low variability categories). 1 of the 9 exemplars was not presented in training and was used as a test of novel transfer. Training trials were 2AFC where participants matched one of two images to a genus label. During training participants received either: 1) random presentation, 2) adaptive sequencing, or 3) adaptive sequencing with sets of 3 sequential category exemplars (mini-blocks). Participants completed pre and post-tests immediately before and after training, and an additional post-test after a 1-week delay. Results: Learning efficiency (accuracy per learning trials invested) was reliably greater for adaptive sequencing. Effects persisted over a 1-week delay and were larger for novel items. In experiment 2 where the variability of category exemplars was lower, adaptive sequencing resulted in even greater learning efficiency gains. Mini-blocks hurt efficiency in both experiments, especially for novel items. Conclusion: Results suggest that, across a range of category distributions, adaptive sequencing (but not blocking) increases the rate of learning and benefits novel transfer – key components of PL and fundamental aspects of learning in many domains.

Mettler, E. Kellman, P. (2010). Adaptive Sequencing in Perceptual Learning [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 10(7):1098, 1098a, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/7/1098, doi:10.1167/10.7.1098. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 Supported by US Dept. of Education, Institute for Education Sciences (IES) Grant R305H060070 to PK.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×