August 2010
Volume 10, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2010
Dissociating between long-term and short-term visual learning
Author Affiliations
  • Amit Yashar
    Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University
  • Dominique Lamy
    Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University
Journal of Vision August 2010, Vol.10, 1143. doi:10.1167/10.7.1143
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Amit Yashar, Dominique Lamy; Dissociating between long-term and short-term visual learning. Journal of Vision 2010;10(7):1143. doi: 10.1167/10.7.1143.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Practice can induce considerable improvement in one's ability to perform a visual task. When the improvement is long lasting, it is usually referred to as perceptual learning and considered to reflect plasticity of the brain. A substantial part of this improvement occurs at the beginning of training (Ahissar and Hochstein, 1996). However such short-term improvement can also reflect other processes than brain plasticity such as adaptation and strategic shifts (Goldstone 1998). The objective of the present study was to dissociate the mechanisms that underlie long-term (LT) and short-term (ST) improvement in a pop-out detection task comprising of 8 sessions held 1 to 3 days apart from each other. Observers were required to detect a target defined as a uniquely oriented line among homogeneously oriented lines. Search displays were presented briefly and then masked. Improvement, measured as increased detection accuracy with practice, was observed both within the first session (ST improvement) and between each session and the following one (LT improvement). ST Improvement generalized to displays in which the target and distractors features on the task-relevant dimension (orientation) swapped, but not to displays in which a change occurred on an irrelevant dimension (color). By contrast, LT improvement generalized to displays in which a change occurred on color, but not to displays in which target and distractors orientations swapped. These results suggest that LT perceptual learning modulates early representations that are fine-tuned to specific features, whereas ST improvement modulates later representations in which the different stimulus features are bound.

Yashar, A. Lamy, D. (2010). Dissociating between long-term and short-term visual learning [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 10(7):1143, 1143a, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/7/1143, doi:10.1167/10.7.1143. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×