August 2010
Volume 10, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2010
Modeling gaze priorities in driving
Author Affiliations
  • Brian Sullivan
    Center for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas at Austin
  • Constantin Rothkopf
    Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Goethe University
  • Mary Hayhoe
    Center for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas at Austin
  • Dana Ballard
    Center for Perceptual Systems, University of Texas at Austin
Journal of Vision August 2010, Vol.10, 139. doi:10.1167/10.7.139
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Brian Sullivan, Constantin Rothkopf, Mary Hayhoe, Dana Ballard; Modeling gaze priorities in driving. Journal of Vision 2010;10(7):139. doi: 10.1167/10.7.139.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Gaze behavior in complex tasks (e.g. navigation) has been studied[1,2] but it is still unknown in detail how humans allocate gaze within complex scenes especially in temporally demanding contexts. We have previously studied gaze allocation in a virtual walking environment and modeled human behavior using a reinforcement-learning model[2]. We adapted this approach to the study of visuomotor behavior in virtual driving, allowing for controlled visual stimuli (e.g. other car paths) and monitoring of human motor control (e.g. steering). The model chooses amongst a set of visuomotor behaviors for following and avoiding other cars and successfully directs the car through an urban environment. Performance of the model was compared to that of human subjects. Eye movements were tracked while driving in a virtual environment presented in a head mounted display. Subjects were seated in a car interior mounted on a 6 degree-of-freedom hydraulic platform that allows the simulation of vehicle movements. Subjects were instructed to follow a ‘leader’ car and to avoid other traffic present. Our analysis assumes that subjects gaze strategies are a direct measure of task priorities. These priorities can be derived from subject behavior using inverse reinforcement learning to extract individual reward values. The majority of fixations were devoted to keeping gaze on the leader car and a smaller proportion on objects of avoidance, with relatively few fixations on other objects unless no traffic was present. We discuss the detailed measures underlying gaze and motor behavior in these experiments and their relationship to the reinforcement-learning model. Additionally, we will discuss future refinements of the model and techniques using inverse reinforcement learning that allow for better fitting of human data. [1] Jovancevic J, Sullivan B, Hayhoe M.; J Vis. 2006 Dec 15. [2] Rothkopf CA. Modular models of task based visually guided behavior; Ph. D. Thesis.

Sullivan, B. Rothkopf, C. Hayhoe, M. Ballard, D. (2010). Modeling gaze priorities in driving [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 10(7):139, 139a, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/7/139, doi:10.1167/10.7.139. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×