August 2010
Volume 10, Issue 7
Meeting Abstract  |   August 2010
Do We Experience Events in Terms of Time or Time in Terms of Events?
Author Affiliations
  • Brandon M. Liverence
    Perception & Cognition Lab, Department of Psychology, Yale University
  • Brian J. Scholl
    Perception & Cognition Lab, Department of Psychology, Yale University
Journal of Vision August 2010, Vol.10, 295. doi:10.1167/10.7.295
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Brandon M. Liverence, Brian J. Scholl; Do We Experience Events in Terms of Time or Time in Terms of Events?. Journal of Vision 2010;10(7):295. doi: 10.1167/10.7.295.

      Download citation file:

      © 2015 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

  • Supplements

In visual images, we perceive both space (as a continuous visual medium) and objects (that inhabit space). Similarly, in dynamic visual experience, we perceive both continuous time and discrete events. What is the relationship between these units of experience? The most intuitive answer is similar to the spatial case: time is perceived as an underlying medium, which is later segmented into discrete event representations. Here we explore the opposite possibility -- that events are perceptually primitive, and that our subjective experience of temporal durations is constructed out of events. In particular, we explore one direct implication of this possibility: if we perceive time in terms of events, then temporal judgments should be influenced by how an object's motion is segmented into discrete perceptual events, independent of other factors. We observed such effects with several types of event segmentation. For example, the subjective duration of an object's motion along a visible path is longer with a smooth trajectory than when the same trajectory is split into shorter independent pieces, played back in a shuffled order (a path shuffling manipulation). Path shuffling apparently disrupts object continuity -- resulting in new event representations, and flushing detailed memories of the previous segments. In contrast, segmentation cues that preserve event continuity (e.g. a continuous path but with segments separated by sharp turns) shorten subjective durations relative to the same stimuli without any segmentation (e.g. when the segments are bound into a single smoothly-curving path, in trajectory inflection manipulations). In all cases, event segmentation was manipulated independently of psychophysical factors previously implicated in time perception, including overall stimulus energy, attention and predictability. These and other results suggest a new way to think about the fundamental relationship between time and events, and imply that time may be less primitive in the mind than it seems to be.

Liverence, B. M. Scholl, B. J. (2010). Do We Experience Events in Terms of Time or Time in Terms of Events? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 10(7):295, 295a,, doi:10.1167/10.7.295. [CrossRef]
© 2010 ARVO

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.