August 2010
Volume 10, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2010
Attention vs. The Eye: Which stabilizes fixation?
Author Affiliations
  • Linh Dang
    Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute
  • Laura Walker Renninger
    Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute
  • Donald Fletcher
    Califonia Pacific Medical Center
Journal of Vision August 2010, Vol.10, 502. doi:10.1167/10.7.502
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Linh Dang, Laura Walker Renninger, Donald Fletcher; Attention vs. The Eye: Which stabilizes fixation?. Journal of Vision 2010;10(7):502. doi: 10.1167/10.7.502.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Maculopathy patients with a peripheral retinal locus (PRL) for fixation tend to exhibit fixation instability that worsens with PRL eccentricities. Using an artificial scotoma paradigm with normal observers in an orientation discrimination task, we examined the affect of “eccentric attention”, i.e. deviating attention to a PRL (Dang, Renninger & Fletcher, VSS2009). We found the position of the eye in the orbit to be an important factor. In this study, we characterize the relative contribution of gaze and attention deviations to fixation stability and whether it applies to maculopathy patients. Methods: Observers with artificial scotoma performed an orientation discrimination task as a function of eccentricity under three conditions: a) central gaze, eccentric target; b) eccentric gaze, central target; c) eccentric gaze and eccentric target. Maculopathy patients performed a similar task with a) eccentric gaze at the PRL, central target or b) central gaze, eccentric target at the PRL. Results: Artificial scotoma observers experienced a worsening of fixation stability for the eccentric gaze, central target condition as compared to the baseline condition of central gaze, eccentric target. Thus, when the deviation angle of “eccentric attention” is matched, the major cause of eye instability is the position of the eye in the orbit. For zero attentional deviation (eccentric gaze, eccentric target) stability is recovered. Correcting maculopathy patients to use central gaze significantly improved fixation stability. Conclusion: Fixation instability in maculopathy patients may be limited by two factors, 1) the deviation and holding of attention at an eccentric retinal location and 2) the absolute position of the eye in the orbit. If fixation stability is required for an acuity related task, the patient may be able to better stabilize the eye in the center of the orbit by moving their object of regard to an appropriate eccentric location.

Dang, L. Walker Renninger, L. Fletcher, D. (2010). Attention vs. The Eye: Which stabilizes fixation? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 10(7):502, 502a, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/7/502, doi:10.1167/10.7.502. [CrossRef]
Footnotes
 NIH R01 EY018004 Smith-Kettlewell.
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×