August 2010
Volume 10, Issue 7
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2010
Contrast-Negation Impairs Gender but Not Emotion Discrimination
Author Affiliations
  • Pamela Pallett
    Dartmouth College
  • Ming Meng
    Dartmouth College
Journal of Vision August 2010, Vol.10, 603. doi:10.1167/10.7.603
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Pamela Pallett, Ming Meng; Contrast-Negation Impairs Gender but Not Emotion Discrimination. Journal of Vision 2010;10(7):603. doi: 10.1167/10.7.603.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Bruce and Young's (1986) model of face recognition proposed that facial identity and emotional expression are processed independently. Yet, it has been argued that certain processes such as the perception of configural information are an important part of both face recognition and expression perception that can be marred by contrast negation and inversion (Calder & Jansen, 2005; Hole, George, & Dunsmore, 1999). To further investigate the proposed dichotomy between expression perception and the encoding of other facial attributes, we systematically measured threshold sensitivity to differences in gender and emotion in positive contrast vs. contrast-negated faces. Previous studies have shown that gender perception is mediated primarily by the fusiform gyrus, inferior occipital cortex, and cingulate gyrus (Ng, Ciaramitaro, Anstis, Boynton, & Fine, 2006), which largely overlap with the neural pathways underlying face recognition. In contrast, processing of facial expression involves both cortical and subcortical pathways (e.g. amygdala). We predicted that, like recognition, contrast-negation may impair gender discrimination. However, contrast-negation may not necessarily impair emotion discrimination. Accordingly, our participants displayed substantially decreased sensitivity to variation in gender with contrast-negation, but no change in sensitivity when discriminating levels of anger or fear. Although a t-test indicated a significant decrement in sensitivity to levels of happiness with contrast negation, the decrement was significantly less than that observed with gender and not significantly different from the non-significant decrements observed with anger and fear. Moreover, response times decreased with contrast-negation only for gender discriminations. Contrast negation destructs the otherwise highly stable ordinal luminance relations between a few face regions (Gilad, Meng, & Sinha, 2009). Our results suggest that these luminance relations may be important for gender discrimination but not necessarily for emotion discrimination, highlighting separated visual processing of facial expression.

Pallett, P. Meng, M. (2010). Contrast-Negation Impairs Gender but Not Emotion Discrimination [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 10(7):603, 603a, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/7/603, doi:10.1167/10.7.603. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×