September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Non-retinotopic perceptual learning
Author Affiliations
  • Michael Herzog
    Laboratory of Psychophysics, Brain Mind Institute, EPFL, Switzerland
  • Thomas Otto
    Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception, Université Paris Descartes & CNRS
  • Haluk Ögmen
    Center for Neuro-Engineering & Cognitive Science, University of Houston
    Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Houston
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 1022. doi:10.1167/11.11.1022
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Michael Herzog, Thomas Otto, Haluk Ögmen; Non-retinotopic perceptual learning. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):1022. doi: 10.1167/11.11.1022.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Perceptual learning is usually specific for the encoded stimuli. For example, improvements in performance for a certain stimulus do not transfer if the stimulus is rotated by 90 degree or is presented at a different location. These findings are usually taken as evidence that orientation-specific and retinotopic synaptic changes underlie perceptual learning. To test this hypothesis, we used a recently developed non-retinotopic masking paradigm. An offset vernier was followed by nine consecutive pairs of non-offset flanking lines arranged along a circular trajectory, giving rise to the percept of two diverging and turning motion streams. Critically, the vernier itself was invisible but its offset was perceived at the last line of the stream, which had a different orientation and location than the vernier. For 4,000 training trials, sixteen observers attended to one motion stream and indicated the perceived offset direction (left vs. right). Performance improved significantly. In addition, we measured performance for various other stimulus configurations before and after training. Our results show that the improvement in performance is specific for the orientation and location of the perceived offset of the last line of the attended motion stream but not for the actual orientation and location of the invisible vernier. Hence, orientation-specific, retinotopic synaptic changes cannot explain our results. We propose instead that perceptual learning involves changes in non-retinotopic, attentional readout processes.

Swiss National Science Foundation. 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×