September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Object identification has fixed capacity: Evidence for serial processing in the formation of perceptual objects
Author Affiliations
  • Alec Scharff
    University of Washington
  • John Palmer
    University of Washington
  • Cathleen M. Moore
    University of Iowa
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 103. doi:10.1167/11.11.103
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alec Scharff, John Palmer, Cathleen M. Moore; Object identification has fixed capacity: Evidence for serial processing in the formation of perceptual objects. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):103. doi: 10.1167/11.11.103.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: Many theories of vision include the formation of a structural description of perceptual objects as an intermediate step between feature extraction and semantic analysis. We ask whether the formation of perceptual objects is affected by divided attention. Can one create multiple perceptual objects independently and in parallel during early organization of the retinal image? Or, alternatively, must one apply a serial mechanism to create perceptual objects one by one? Previously, we found that categorization of animal images (e.g., wolf vs. bear) is limited by a fixed-capacity mechanism. In that study, either a structural or a semantic analysis of objects might have imposed the bottleneck. Here, we used a physical identification task that emphasizes the structural analysis of objects and minimizes the semantic analysis.

Methods: To measure perceptual capacity, we used the extended simultaneous-sequential paradigm, which can distinguish between unlimited- and fixed-capacity processes (Scharff, Palmer, & Moore, in press). Observers searched for a specific target object among physically similar distracters. Stimuli were photographs of objects taken from several possible viewpoints. Three sets of artificial objects were used: cut-foam solids, toy-block constructions, and crumpled papers. For example, some trials required searching for a particular crumpled paper among similar crumpled papers, all seen from varying viewpoints. Thus, observers searched for a specific object, not a category or an image.

Results: Our findings were consistent with a fixed-capacity model for the physical identification of multiple objects. These findings rule out an unlimited-capacity model. We argue that there is a fixed-capacity limit to the formation of structural descriptions of objects. This is consistent with a serial mechanism, or with a parallel mechanism that acquires information from multiple objects at a fixed rate.

University of Washington Royalty Research Fund. 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×