September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Contour interaction under monocular and dichoptic viewing conditions for luminance-modulated and contrast-modulated Cs
Author Affiliations
  • Monika A. Formankiewicz
    Anglia Vision Research, Anglia Ruskin University
    Department of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University
  • Sarah J. Waugh
    Anglia Vision Research, Anglia Ruskin University
    Department of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University
  • Akash S. Chima
    Anglia Vision Research, Anglia Ruskin University
    Department of Vision and Hearing Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 1147. doi:10.1167/11.11.1147
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Monika A. Formankiewicz, Sarah J. Waugh, Akash S. Chima; Contour interaction under monocular and dichoptic viewing conditions for luminance-modulated and contrast-modulated Cs. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):1147. doi: 10.1167/11.11.1147.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Resolution acuity is degraded by the presence of flanking bars. This contour interaction is observed under monocular and dichoptic viewing conditions, pointing to its cortical origin (Flom et al., 1963). The exact locus of the interaction remains unclear but areas beyond V1 have been suggested (review by Levi, 2008). The peak of contour interaction for contrast-modulated (CM) stimuli is higher than that observed for luminance-modulated (LM) stimuli under monocular viewing conditions (Hairol et al., VSS2010). CM stimuli are thought to be processed at a higher, more binocular cortical region than LM stimuli, and binocular interactions at the level of detection are different for the two types of stimuli (e.g. Waugh et al, VSS2009). We asked whether this is also true for suprathreshold stimuli and investigated contour interaction for LM and CM square-C stimuli, in monocular and dichoptic foveal viewing. In each condition, resolution thresholds were determined for a briefly presented isolated C and a C flanked by bars placed from abutting to one optotype width away from the target. The target was presented to the non-dominant eye. With monocular viewing, we again found that the peak contour interaction was greater for CM than for LM stimuli (by ∼0.1 logMAR). Under dichoptic viewing conditions, contour interaction for LM stimuli was on average greater (by ∼0.05–0.1 logMAR) and more extensive than in monocular viewing, but this change was not observed for CM stimuli. The lack of enhancement of contour interaction for CM stimuli under dichoptic conditions (where neural combination of target and flankers is required) suggests that these stimuli may be processed at the (binocular) locus of contour interaction. The differential effect of viewing conditions on the interaction for LM stimuli supports the notion that the processing of these stimuli takes place at a lower cortical level than that of CM stimuli.

ASC is supported by the College of Optometrists Postgraduate Scholarship. 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×