September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Searching for target parts
Author Affiliations
  • Robert Alexander
    Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, USA
  • Gregory Zelinsky
    Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, USA
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 1321. doi:10.1167/11.11.1321
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Robert Alexander, Gregory Zelinsky; Searching for target parts. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):1321. doi: 10.1167/11.11.1321.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Real-world objects typically consist of multiple parts. When searching for a multi-part object, are all of its parts used, or just a select few? In experiment 1, participants were cued with one, three, or all four parts of a photorealistic teddy bear target, then searched for the whole target among three other images of whole teddy bears. We found that reaction times (p < .001), accuracy (p < .001), guidance (as measured by time to target fixation; p < .05), and verification time (as measured by time between target fixation and response; p < .001) all improved with the number of target parts added to the cue, suggesting that all of these parts were loaded into visual working memory and used to facilitate search. However, some parts were more useful than others. Guidance (p < .05) was best when the torso of the target bear was cued; accuracy (p < .05) and verification time (p < .01) were best when the bear's head was cued. In experiment 2, participants were cued with the whole bear, but now the search display depicted 4-part (whole bear), 3-part, or 1-part target and distractor bears. Accuracy (p < .05) and verification time (p < .05) were again best when the target's head appeared in the search display, but no benefit was found for search guidance (p > .05). We conclude that the head/face is preferentially weighted in the target representation when the target contains a head/face, in conjunction with other parts. However, when considered separately, the torsos of our targets allowed for the most effective guiding template, perhaps because they were more homogenous in texture and color. Our results suggest that search guidance increases with the number of target parts, but that all of these parts are not equally effective in guiding search.

NIH 2-R01-MH063748. 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×