September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Object-based attention and prioritization revealed by the temporal order judgment method
Author Affiliations
  • Ian Donovan
    Department of Psychology, George Washington University, USA
  • Jay Pratt
    Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Canada
  • Sarah Shomstein
    Department of Psychology, George Washington University, USA
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 150. doi:10.1167/11.11.150
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ian Donovan, Jay Pratt, Sarah Shomstein; Object-based attention and prioritization revealed by the temporal order judgment method. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):150. doi: 10.1167/11.11.150.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Recent studies suggest that object-based attentional guidance is a result of attentional prioritization. It is proposed that in the absence of an alternative strategy, items appearing on the same object are prioritized over items appearing on a different object (Shomstein & Yantis, 2002; Drummond & Shomstein, 2008). It should be noted, however, that studies providing evidence for attentional prioritization have relied on spatial cuing paradigms. As such it is not clear whether attentional prioritization emerges from spatial orienting or is independent of it. Here, we use a novel method – the temporal order judgment (TOJ) – to examine whether attentional prioritization emerges in the absence of spatial cuing. Participants were presented with two rectangles oriented either horizontally or vertically. Following a 1s preview time two target stimuli were presented on the same or different objects and participants were asked to report which of the two stimuli appeared first. It was observed, using a cueless TOJ paradigm, that items appearing on the same object show visual prior entry effects; same object stimuli are prioritized by the perceptual-attentional system over stimuli that appear on the different object. In the second experiment we examined whether this same-object prior entry effect is automatic or is a default setting that is abandoned in the presence of an alternative strategy. Here we modified the TOJ paradigm to include twice as many trials on which targets appeared on the different-object as those appearing on the same-object. With a 2:1 ratio of different- to same-object trials there was no longer a prior entry effect present for the same- vs. different-object targets. These results provide strong support for the attentional prioritization hypothesis, demonstrating that priorities are determined independent of spatial orienting. Additionally, these experiments introduce a novel paradigm for measuring object-based attentional guidance.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×