September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Spatial relationship judgment requires selection of each object in turn, even when object identification does not
Author Affiliations
  • Kaitlin Turner
    Northwestern University, USA
  • Hyejin Yang
    Northwestern University, USA
  • Steven Franconeri
    Northwestern University, USA
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 215. doi:10.1167/11.11.215
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kaitlin Turner, Hyejin Yang, Steven Franconeri; Spatial relationship judgment requires selection of each object in turn, even when object identification does not. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):215. doi: 10.1167/11.11.215.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

We often need to process the spatial relationships between objects; e.g., when noticing that your mouse is to the right of your keyboard. One challenge of spatial relationship judgments is properly binding different identities with their respective positions, even when those identities can be extracted in parallel. One solution to this problem is to select one object at a time - if so, then even in the simplest spatial relationship judgments where we feel that we select two objects at once (keyboard and mouse), we must actually select single objects in a sequence over time (keyboard -> mouse). To demonstrate this effect, we primed participants with a Navon letter task to select either single (local attentional scope) or multiple (global attentional scope) objects, immediately before performing either a spatial relationship judgment between two colors (which should require proper binding) or a same-different identity judgment between the two colors (where binding should not be important). There was an interaction such that spatial relationships were judged faster under single object selection primes, and same-different identity was judged faster under multiple-object selection primes. These results provide evidence for a counter-intuitive possibility - that even when object identities are available, knowing where they are relative to each other requires that we select them sequentially over time.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×