September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Spatial attention affects perceived stimulus position
Author Affiliations
  • Paola Binda
    University of Washington, USA
    CNR - Pisa, USA
  • M. Concetta Morrone
    Università di Pisa, USA
    Scientific Institute Stella Maris, USA
  • Geoffrey M. Boynton
    University of Washington, USA
  • Scott O. Murray
    University of Washington, USA
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 229. doi:10.1167/11.11.229
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Paola Binda, M. Concetta Morrone, Geoffrey M. Boynton, Scott O. Murray; Spatial attention affects perceived stimulus position. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):229. doi: 10.1167/11.11.229.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Spatial attention can shift receptive field positions (Womelsdorf et al., 2006) and alter neural maps even in early visual areas (Fischer & Whitney, 2009). Here we report a shift in the perceived location of a peripheral stimulus when it is attended, but not when attention is continuously directed at fixation.

Two 3 × 0.5 deg vertical bars (100% contrast) were flashed (50 ms) in the right peripheral visual field (18 deg eccentricity), one above and one below the horizontal meridian, with variable Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA). Subjects judged the horizontal location of the bottom bar relative to the top bar. When the bars were asynchronous, the second bar was perceived more to the right (more peripheral) than the first one by about 20% of the stimulus eccentricity. The size of perceived displacement increased with SOA up to about 250 ms and remained constant for all SOAs tested (up to 3.5 s). Crucially, the mislocalization effect vanished when spatial attention was drawn away from the stimuli. Attention was drawn away from the stimulus by adding a demanding primary task at fixation (reporting the sum of two digits flashed simultaneously with the peripheral stimuli). With attention drawn away, localization of the two peripheral stimuli appeared to be equal distances from fixation, regardless of their order of presentation. However, the localization bias reemerged when the primary task was moved to the location of the stimuli.

Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that a covert shift of spatial attention causes distortions of visual space as a result of either shifting receptive fields of neurons that represent the attended location, or by a shift of perceived eye position.

NSF CAREER 0845901. 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×