September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
The Perception of Body Movements: The Role of Biological Motion and Form
Author Affiliations
  • Ayse P. Saygin
    University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
  • Thierry Chaminade
    CNRS - Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
  • Burcu A. Urgen
    University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
  • Hiroshi Ishuguro
    Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
    ATR, Keihanna Science City, Kyoto, Japan
  • Jon Driver
    University College London, London, UK
  • Chris Frith
    University College London, London, UK
    University of Aarhus, Denmark
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 741. doi:10.1167/11.11.741
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ayse P. Saygin, Thierry Chaminade, Burcu A. Urgen, Hiroshi Ishuguro, Jon Driver, Chris Frith; The Perception of Body Movements: The Role of Biological Motion and Form. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):741. doi: 10.1167/11.11.741.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The perception of others' body movements is subserved by a network of lateral temporal, parietal, and premotor brain areas, here called the action perception system (APS). Using fMRI adaptation, we explored selectivity for biological motion and/or biological form in this network. Participants watched 2 s clips of recognizable actions of a human (biological motion and form), a humanoid robot (mechanical motion and form), or an android (mechanical motion, biological form). The latter conditions actually were of the same robot, with identical kinematics, videotaped with or without human-like skin. Each movie clip was preceded by the same movie or a different movie and we explored brain areas that showed adaptation. With the exception of left extrastriate body area, which showed adaptation for biological appearance (human and android), the APS was not selective for motion or form per se. Instead, specific responses were found to the mismatch between motion and form: Whereas fMRI adaptation results for the human and robot (the agents that differed in both motion and form) conditions were similar to each other, there were additional areas of adaptation for the android condition. Most notably, in bilateral anterior intraparietal sulcus, a key node in the APS, we found significantly more adaptation for the android than the other agents, indicating the congruence of form and motion is an important factor to consider. We interpret these data in the predictive coding framework (Rao and Ballard, 1999) and suggest that these additional responses to the android reflect increased prediction error as the brain negotiates an agent that looks biological, but does not move biologically. These results contribute to our goal of identifying the functional properties of the APS, and may also help demystify the “uncanny valley” hypothesis from robotics, whereby artificial agents that are too human-like can evoke negative reactions (Mori, 1970).

Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind. California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology and. 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×