September 2011
Volume 11, Issue 11
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2011
Learning to reach for “invisible” objects: evidence for “blindsight” in normal observers
Author Affiliations
  • Warrick Roseboom
    School of Psychology, University of Queensland
  • Derek Arnold
    School of Psychology, University of Queensland
Journal of Vision September 2011, Vol.11, 958. doi:10.1167/11.11.958
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Warrick Roseboom, Derek Arnold; Learning to reach for “invisible” objects: evidence for “blindsight” in normal observers. Journal of Vision 2011;11(11):958. doi: 10.1167/11.11.958.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Blindsight refers to the ability of patients with visual cortex damage to detect, localise or discriminate visual stimuli that they deny “seeing”. In this study we sought to create an analog of blindsight in normal observers using binocular masking via continuous flash suppression. We had participants reach toward and pretend to grasp an imaginary object represented by a pair of parallel lines, oriented horizontally or vertically, made “invisible” via masking. The dependent variable was the orientation of the hand, horizontal or vertical, at grasp. Over a period of training (six 100 trial sessions) during which trial-by-trial feedback was provided, participants showed a significant improvement in their ability to orient their hand to grasp the “invisible” target. No such improvement was evident when other participants responded using only verbal responses, even with a matched period of training. Trial-by-trial reports of subjective visibility and confidence in performance revealed that, while participants never reported “seeing” the target, performance was highly correlated with confidence. These data have important implications for the treatment of cortically blind patients, and highlight the indistinct boundaries between what we consider visible and invisible inputs.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×