August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
Emergent Features Predict Grouping in Search and Classification Tasks
Author Affiliations
  • Anna Cragin
    Department of Psychology, Rice University
  • Amanda Hahn
    Department of Psychology, Rice University
  • James Pomerantz
    Department of Psychology, Rice University
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 431. doi:10.1167/12.9.431
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Anna Cragin, Amanda Hahn, James Pomerantz; Emergent Features Predict Grouping in Search and Classification Tasks. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):431. doi: 10.1167/12.9.431.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Emergent Features (EFs) are properties that are not possessed by any individual part, but arise only from the configuration of parts. They are furthermore processed more quickly than are the properties of the parts, and the presence of EFs makes configurations more salient than their parts. Converging evidence from two tasks showed strong support for EFs as the basis for grouping. In the Search Task, discrimination between the orientations of line segments (bases) was facilitated by the addition of "context" line segments, but only when those contexts created EF differences between the target shape and the shape of the distractors. Faster search times in the "composite condition" relative to the base (i.e., no context added) indicate the presence of a Configural Superiority Effect (CSE; Pomerantz & Portillo, 2011). In the Classification Task, either the base or the context was relevant for classifying composite images into predetermined response categories. Variation in the irrelevant portion of the image slowed performance relative to a control condition where the irrelevant portion does not vary from trial to trial. Such a detriment in performance is termed Garner Interference (GI; Pomerantz & Garner, 1973), and is indicative of subjects’ reduced ability or preference to pay selective attention, electing instead to pay more attention to the whole configuration. We reasoned that when elements are perceptually organized, forming a Gestalt, (1) discrimination is enhanced when contexts produce more salient properties (yielded a CSE), and (2) the ability to selectively attend to any one element is impaired (GI). Thus, CSE and GI effects can be diagnostic of grouping. Results indicated that the type and number of EF differences and similarities, coded by using the Tversky Contrast Model (Tversky, 1977), can successfully predict both of these effects and, by extension, grouping.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×