August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
Visual Configuration affects spatial distribution of the attentional blink
Author Affiliations
  • Feng Du
    State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Kan Zhang
    State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 565. doi:10.1167/12.9.565
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Feng Du, Kan Zhang; Visual Configuration affects spatial distribution of the attentional blink. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):565. doi: 10.1167/12.9.565.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

A recent study found that attentional blink impaired performance on the second target (T2) with the effect being weakest at the first target (T1) location and locations far away from T1 (Du, Abrams & Zhang, 2011). This finding of a U-shaped spatial distribution of AB is consistent with lateral inhibition theory and in sharp contrast to many previous studies (Jefferies & Di Lollo, 2009; Kawahara, 2002; Olivers, 2004). Present study manipulated the spatial configuration of multiple RSVP streams to examine whether the U-shaped spatial distribution of AB in Du et al. study (2011) was due to a circular configuration of visual stimuli. In Experiment 1, we replicated a U-shaped spatial distribution of AB as Du et al. study when presenting six RSVP streams on an imaginary circle with a diameter of 15 degree (Please see Figure 1 in supplementary material for results). However, Experiment 2 found a similar U-shaped distribution of AB even when diameter of the imaginary circle shrunk to 10 degree (Please see Figure 2 for details), indicating the U-shaped distribution of AB was not determined by spatial distance between T1 & T2 per se. In Experiment 3, we managed to present four RSVP streams at four random locations while maintaining the eccentricity of two targets as that in Experiment 1. And we found that T2 performance decreased as the distance between T1 and T2 increased (As Figure 3 showed, the AB was weakest at T1 location and strongest at locations 15 degree away from T1) . Therefore a U-shaped distribution of AB in Du et al. study (2011) was due to the circular configuration of visual stimuli rather than spatial separation between T1 and T2. In conclusion, the configuration of visual stimuli affects the spatial distribution of AB.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×