August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: Additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task
Author Affiliations
  • Christopher Benwell
    Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, School of Psychology, University of Glasgow\nSchool of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, United Kingdom
  • Monika Harvey
    School of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, United Kingdom
  • Stephanie Gardner
    School of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, United Kingdom
  • Gregor Thut
    Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, School of Psychology, University of Glasgow
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 571. doi:10.1167/12.9.571
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christopher Benwell, Monika Harvey, Stephanie Gardner, Gregor Thut; Stimulus- and state-dependence of systematic bias in spatial attention: Additive effects of stimulus-size and time-on-task. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):571. doi: 10.1167/12.9.571.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Systematic biases in spatial attention are a common finding. In the general population, a systematic leftward bias is typically observed (pseudo-neglect), possibly as a consequence of right hemisphere dominance for visuospatial attention. However, this leftward bias can cross-over to a systematic rightward bias with changes in stimulus and state factors (such as line length and arousal). The processes governing these changes are still unknown. Here we tested models of spatial attention as to their ability to account for these effects. To this end, we experimentally manipulated both stimulus and state factors, while healthy participants performed a computerized version of a landmark task. State was manipulated by time-on-task (>1 hour) leading to increased fatigue and a reliable left- to rightward shift in spatial bias. Stimulus was manipulated by presenting long or short lines. An attenuation of the leftward bias was observed in short compared to long lines. Importantly, we found time-on-task and line length effects to be additive suggesting a common denominator for line bisection across all conditions, which is in disagreement with models that assume that bisection decisions in long and short lines are governed by distinct processes (Magnitude estimation vs. Global/local distinction). Our findings emphasize the dynamic rather than static nature of spatial biases in midline judgement. They are best captured by theories of spatial attention positing that spatial bias is flexibly modulated, and subject to interhemispheric balance which can change over time or conditions to accommodate task demands or reflect fatigue.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×