August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
Adaptation aftereffects in the perception of radiological images
Author Affiliations
  • Elysse Kompaniez
    Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno
  • Craig K. Abbey
    Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara\nDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis
  • John M. Boone
    Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis\nDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis
  • Michael A. Webster
    Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 602. doi:10.1167/12.9.602
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Elysse Kompaniez, Craig K. Abbey, John M. Boone, Michael A. Webster; Adaptation aftereffects in the perception of radiological images. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):602. doi: 10.1167/12.9.602.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Radiologists must classify and interpret medical images on the basis of visual inspection. We are examining how an observer’s visual sensitivity and perception might change as they view and thus adapt to the characteristic properties of radiological scans. Measurements were focused on the effects of adaptation to images of normal mammograms, and were tested in observers who were not radiologists. These scans have steeper power spectra (slopes of ~-3) than natural images (~-2) and thus are physically blurry. To test for adaptation specific to this blur, we measured contrast sensitivity for Gabor patches after observers viewed a sequence of randomly sampled sections from mammograms. Sensitivity was selectively reduced at lower spatial frequencies (less than ~2 c/deg), consistent with an adaptation to the low-frequency bias in the images. However, similar sensitivity losses were also found when the images were sharpened to have more "natural" spectra, suggesting that the blur in the scans was not sufficient to substantially change threshold sensitivity relative to the observer’s natural operating state. In contrast, aftereffects specific to the image blur were found when observers instead judged the perceived blur within the images, by adjusting the spectral slope of a comparison image presented to an unadapted retinal location. Strong aftereffects in the appearance of the images were also found when observers judged the perceived texture of the images. For example, tissue density in mammograms is routinely classified and ranges from "dense" to "fatty." Adaptation to dense images caused an intermediate image to appear more fatty and vice versa. Our results suggest that observers can selectively adapt to the properties of radiological images, and that this selectivity could especially impact the perceived textural characteristics of the images.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×