August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
Multiple coordinate frames for reaches revealed through adaptation
Author Affiliations
  • Michael Landy
    Dept. of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University
  • Todd Hudson
    Dept. of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 607. doi:10.1167/12.9.607
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Michael Landy, Todd Hudson; Multiple coordinate frames for reaches revealed through adaptation. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):607. doi: 10.1167/12.9.607.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

In what coordinate system are visually guided reaches encoded? We introduce a novel, sensitive method for measuring the adaptive response to reach feedback perturbation, and provide evidence that both polar and Cartesian coordinate systems are used, because adaptive responses can be made to both polar and Cartesian perturbations. Methods: Subjects made center-out reaches on a tabletop with fixed starting point and target distance, with target direction random over trials. Starting point, target, and reach endpoint feedback were shown on a frontoparallel display. During the reach, only the target was shown. After reach completion, fingertip location was shown shifted spatially. The amount of shift was a sinewave over trials. For Cartesian perturbation, on trial t, xdisplay = xfinger + A sin(2πfxt) and similarly for y perturbed with frequency fy. For polar perturbation, gain of displayed relative to actual reach extent was perturbed around 1.0 with a sinewave of frequency fγ and reach direction was perturbed at frequency fθ. For Cartesian, fx=5 and fy=7 cycle/session; A = 6 mm. For polar, the same frequencies were used, and amplitudes were set to achieve similar maximum perturbations. Bayesian methods were used to detect sinusoidal corrections in response to perturbation and to estimate parameters. Results: Under Cartesian perturbation, subjects corrected for both x and y perturbations; under polar perturbation, independent correction of gain and direction was found. In addition, correction was found for reaches to targets at which feedback was never given. Thus, observers could adapt using either coordinate system, as appropriate. The sinewave-perturbation technique provides a far more sensitive technique for measuring adaptation than the typical step-function technique, allowing the use of perturbations so small that subjects are not consciously aware of them.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×