August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
Do athletes see space differently?
Author Affiliations
  • Owen Masters
    Psychology Department, Swarthmore College
  • Brittany Schmelz
    Psychology Department, Swarthmore College
  • Keenan Leonard-Solis
    Psychology Department, Swarthmore College
  • Frank Durgin
    Psychology Department, Swarthmore College
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 903. doi:10.1167/12.9.903
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Owen Masters, Brittany Schmelz, Keenan Leonard-Solis, Frank Durgin; Do athletes see space differently?. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):903. doi: 10.1167/12.9.903.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Many varsity athletes participate in sports for which there are standardized dimensions with which they are familiar. In baseball, the distance to first base is 90 feet (27 m). In basketball, the rim of the basket is 10 feet above the court. We compared varsity athletes with other students using distance and height estimation tasks, perceptual matching tasks and action tasks (walking and throwing). Unsurprisingly, all participants were fairly well calibrated for throwing and for walking to targets 7.5 m away. Athletes were less variable, as a group, in their walking performance than non-athletes, F(22, 25) = 2.42, p = .0173, (COVs of 7% and 16%), but both groups were similar in throwing performance (COVs of 9% and 11%). Variability seemed to be in performance, not perception: There was no correlation between walking and throwing performance in either group, nor was either action measure correlated with verbal estimates. Our varsity athletes were more likely to be familiar with common sport dimensions (even for sports they did not play), and were much more accurate at estimating our far distances (e.g., averaging 12.1 m estimates for a distance of 12.5 m) than were other students (9.9 m), t(47) = 2.09, p = .045. Estimates of height, however, were similarly accurate for the two groups; most people reported using units of human height for comparison. Crucially, when engaged in a perceptual matching task -- matching their egocentric distance from a pole to the vertical extent of the pole -- athletes performed nearly identically to non-athletes (e.g., both groups judged an egocentric distance of 31 m to be equal to the height of a 20 m pole). It appears that the perceptual experiences of distance for the two groups did not differ, but that the varsity athletes were much better calibrated at verbally estimating longer distances.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×