August 2012
Volume 12, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2012
Different activity in the early stage of the perceptual processing of closed and open figures
Author Affiliations
  • Weina Zhu
    School of Information Science, Yunnan University\nKunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  • Yuanye Ma
    Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Journal of Vision August 2012, Vol.12, 1305. doi:10.1167/12.9.1305
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Weina Zhu, Yuanye Ma; Different activity in the early stage of the perceptual processing of closed and open figures. Journal of Vision 2012;12(9):1305. doi: 10.1167/12.9.1305.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Closure is an emergent perceptual feature that the visual system might extract as a primitive feature of an object. The discrimination of closure is typically faster and easier than that of other geometrical features (Donnelly et al., 1991; Pomerantz et al., 1977; Treisman and Paterson, 1984). The specific nature of closure may be important for the computing object representations. However, there are some questions still unclear: When do closed figures begin deviating from open figures? What is the neural substrate of this perceptual advantage? To investigate these questions, we recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) during a passive observation paradigm. In our study, six pairs of stimuli were used to assess the difference between closed and open figures. Only one of the two figures in each pair was closed, while other low-level features were carefully controlled. We found closed figures deviated from open figures around 110 ms (t(13) = 2.16, P<0.05), with smaller N1 amplitudes for closed than open figures (-5.3uv vs -8.6uv) at almost identical latency (121.8ms vs. 122.7ms). From these results we propose, compared to open figures, the closed figures need less perception processing at early stages of the visual system. To test this hypothesis, we employed a continuous flash suppression (CFS) paradigm to compare the perception of closed and open figures. Same figures were used in CFS experiment. We find closed figures took less time to be perceived after the suppression (1677ms vs. 1951 ms) at a slightly better accuracy (99.1% vs. 97.9% correct). Our results indicate that, closed figures were discriminated from open figures at around 110 ms. compared to open figures, the closed figures possessed a perceptional advantage and were more rapid to reach awareness during CFS. This was reflected in the ERP traces: closed figures induced smaller N1 amplitudes than open figures.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2012

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×