July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
The anisotropy of color space
Author Affiliations
  • Marina Danilova
    Laboratory of Visual Physiology, I.P.Pavlov Institute of Physiology, St. Petersburg, Russia\nDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK
  • John Mollon
    Department of Experimental Psychology, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 294. doi:10.1167/13.9.294
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Marina Danilova, John Mollon; The anisotropy of color space. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):294. doi: 10.1167/13.9.294.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Color discrimination is conventionally thought to depend on two neural signals. One signal, carried by midget ganglion cells, represents the ratio of the long- (L) and middle-wave (M) cone excitations. This signal corresponds to the horizontal axis of the MacLeod-Boynton chromaticity diagram. The second signal, carried by small bistratified ganglion cells, represents the ratio of short-wave (S) cone excitation to some combination of L and M excitations, and corresponds to the vertical axis of the MacLeod-Boynton diagram. Phenomenologically, however, the MacLeod-Boynton space is not symmetrical about a vertical line through the white point: It is divided into reddish and greenish hues by a line that runs obliquely, from unique yellow to unique blue. We scale the MacLeod-Boynton diagram so that the yellow-blue line lies at an angle of ̴9;45° (Danilova & Mollon, 2012, Vision Research, 62, 162-172). Measuring discrimination along lines orthogonal to the yellow-blue line (i.e. lines at +45° in the space), we previously found that forced-choice thresholds were minimal at the category boundary between reddish and greenish hues – and not, say, at a constant value of L/M or of S/(L+M). However, what would happen if we reflect our experiment about the vertical axis of MacLeod-Boynton space, measuring chromatic discriminations along lines that are at -45°? We measured such discriminations for 150-ms, foveal targets divided into four quadrants, requiring observers to report the quadrant that differed in chromaticity from the other three. Observers were adapted to a field metameric to Illuminant D65. Two main results emerge: (i) discrimination along ̴9;45° lines does show a shallow minimum and (ii) for lines not passing through D65, the minimum does not coincide with the L/M value of the background. We conclude that a phenomenological boundary is not necessary for a minimum in discrimination measurements.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×