July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Free
Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
A high-dimensional pooling model accounts for seemingly conflicting substitution effects in crowding
Author Affiliations
  • Shaiyan Keshvari
    Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Ruth Rosenholtz
    Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology\nComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 576. doi:10.1167/13.9.576
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Shaiyan Keshvari, Ruth Rosenholtz; A high-dimensional pooling model accounts for seemingly conflicting substitution effects in crowding. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):576. doi: 10.1167/13.9.576.

      Download citation file:


      © 2015 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Visual crowding is a phenomenon in which the perception of a peripheral target depends on nearby, task-irrelevant flankers. The exact nature of this dependency is controversial (Whitney & Levi 2011). Phenomenologically, some flanker features appear to be confused, or substituted, with target features. One current debate (akin to early- vs. late-selection debates in attention) centers around whether substitution occurs for entire objects, for basic features, or something in between. Results have been mixed: in letter stimuli, observers sometimes appear to swap the target with entire flankers (van den Berg et al. 2012), to preferably swap with similar flankers, or to report letters not present in the display (Freeman et al. 2012). In feature conjunction stimuli, observers appear to swap unbound features (Põder & Wagemans 2007), whereas in stimuli of intermediate complexity observers appear to lose location information after binding simple features (Greenwood et al. 2012). We ask whether a high-dimensional pooling model can predict these seemingly disparate results. In this model (Balas et al 2009), the visual system measures a texture descriptor (Portilla & Simoncelli 2000) in each local pooling region. We test whether the ambiguities and confusions inherent in this representation can account for diverse substitution phenomena. To do this, we synthesize new images ("mongrels") which share the same texture descriptor as the original stimuli. We find that the model explains seemingly contradictory results. In mongrels of "complex" letter stimuli, we observe swapping of flankers with targets, preferred generation of similar flankers, and synthesis of absent letters. Mongrels of simple feature conjunction stimuli show illusory conjunctions, supporting observations of non-binding of features. Mongrels of arrays of crosses (Greenwood et al. 2012), typically reproduce arrays of crosses, in line with apparent low-level "binding" in crowding of these stimuli. Thus, our high-dimensional pooling model can reconcile disparate crowding accounts.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013

© 2013 ARVO
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×