July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
Real-world size influences visual search efficiency
Author Affiliations
  • Bria Long
    Harvard University, Department of Psychology
  • Talia Konkle
    Harvard University, Department of Psychology
  • Michael A. Cohen
    Harvard University, Department of Psychology
  • George A. Alvarez
    Harvard University, Department of Psychology
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 671. doi:10.1167/13.9.671
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Bria Long, Talia Konkle, Michael A. Cohen, George A. Alvarez; Real-world size influences visual search efficiency. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):671. doi: 10.1167/13.9.671.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Real-world size is an intrinsic property of objects: it is accessed automatically when we see an object and predicts a consistent medial-to-lateral organization in ventral temporal cortex (Konkle & Oliva, 2012). Is real-world size a purely abstract concept or a conceptual distinction reflected in perceptual differences? Since visual search performance is primarily determined by perceptual similarity, if big and small objects tend to be perceptually different from each other, it should be easier to find a target object among distractors with a different (vs. same) real-world size than the target. We examined visual search rates for big and small manmade objects (Experiment 1) and big and small animals (Experiment 2). The stimulus sets were matched for familiarity, typicality, aspect ratio, area, contour spikiness, object extent; gray-scale images were equalized across luminance, contrast, and power spectrum (spatial-frequency/orientation). On each trial, a target item was previewed, followed by a search display with 3 or 9 items. All items were presented at the same physical size on the screen, but the distractor items were either from the same or different real-world size category as the target. Participants pressed the space bar when they found the target, after which all items were replaced with X’s and participants clicked on the target’s location. In both experiments, participants were significantly more efficient at finding the target item among different real-world size distractors than among similar real-world size distractors, as indicated by faster search slopes for different-size trials (Objects: different-size slope: 51.88 ms/item, same-size slope: 61.03 ms/item, p<.01; Animals: different-size slope: 70.26 ms/item, same-size slope: 76.88 ms/item, p<.05). Because we controlled for differences in a wide range of basic feature and shape dimensions, these results suggest that real-world size is a conceptual distinction that correlates with mid/high-level perceptual features that guide visual search.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×