July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
Do Scenes Facilitate Action Categorization?
Author Affiliations
  • Adam Larson
    Kansas State University
  • Ryan Ringer
    Kansas State University
  • John Hutson
    Kansas State University
  • Jared Peterson
    Kansas State University
  • Tera Walton
    Kansas State University
  • Conor O'Dea
    Kansas State University
  • Karen Akao
    Kansas State University
  • Patrick Strouts
    Kansas State University
  • Lester Loschky
    Kansas State University
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 1051. doi:10.1167/13.9.1051
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Adam Larson, Ryan Ringer, John Hutson, Jared Peterson, Tera Walton, Conor O'Dea, Karen Akao, Patrick Strouts, Lester Loschky; Do Scenes Facilitate Action Categorization?. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):1051. doi: 10.1167/13.9.1051.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Previous work has shown that event representations are constructed in a coarse-to-fine fashion (Larson, Hendry, & Loschky, 2012). Specifically, an event’s superordinate scene category was recognized first (Indoor or Outdoor), followed by its basic level scene category (Kitchen or Office), and then its basic level action category (Cooking or Washing). This indicates that event representations begin with understanding the scene category. If this is correct, then it suggests that recognizing the scene’s category may facilitate action recognition. Conversely, the surrounding scene image may interfere with processing the action, as suggested by Davenport and Potter (2004), who found that object recognition was better with a blank background than with a scene. Lastly, there may be no effect of the scene background on action recognition, suggesting that the two processes are functionally isolated. Participants categorized actions in one of three image conditions: within 1) their original scene background, 2) a gray background, or 3) on a texture background (Portilla & Simoncelli, 2000) generated from the original image. Scene image processing time was manipulated by varying the target-mask SOA from 24 ms-660 ms (i.e., roughly two fixations). Participants then made a Yes/No response to a valid or invalid action category post-cue. The results showed no difference between the original scene and gray background conditions for SOAs <50 ms, but both were significantly better than the texture background condition. However, for SOAs > 50 ms, the original scene background condition was significantly better than the gray background and texture background conditions. These results indicate that semantic scene information does not facilitate action recognition at the very earliest stages of processing, but does so once gist recognition reaches a threshold (the basic level scene gist inflection point generally around 50 ms SOA). Conversely, unrecognizable visual structure interferes with action categorization for roughly 330 ms.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×