July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
Where I touch is where I see: Visuotactile integration and functional representations of hands and tools.
Author Affiliations
  • Hayley Colman
    School of Psychology, University of Queensland
  • Roger Remington
    School of Psychology, University of Queensland
  • Ada Kritikos
    School of Psychology, University of Queensland
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 1077. doi:10.1167/13.9.1077
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hayley Colman, Roger Remington, Ada Kritikos; Where I touch is where I see: Visuotactile integration and functional representations of hands and tools.. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):1077. doi: 10.1167/13.9.1077.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

There is a dissociation in visuotactile integration depending on the effector that we use (either hands or tools) to complete an action (Maravita, Spence, & Driver, 2003; Maravita, Spence, Kennett, & Driver, 2002). This dissociation relies on the binding of visual inputs at the site of action and tactile inputs arising from the hands (Macaluso & Maravita, 2010). During tool use this manifests as an extension of visuotactile peripersonal space and encompasses the tool tip. Here, we investigated how the interactive properties of hands and tools (action affordances) modulate the integration of visual and tactile sensory inputs. We used foot-pedal and saccadic reaction times (SRTs) in a crossmodal congruency task (CCT) to examine this. In Experiment 1, participants made spatial discriminations of visual stimuli arising from either the grasping (palm) or non-grasping (back) regions of the hand or from hand distant space. Visual stimuli were presented concurrently with tactile stimulation on the sides of the index finger of each hand. Participants were faster to detect targets near the hand compared with those distant from the hand and more so when they arose from the palm-adjacent location. This suggests that crossmodal binding is facilitated in the graspable space of the hand. In Experiment 2 participants were trained with straight stick tools. They then completed the CCT whilst holding a re-configured tool that disambiguated the hemi-space of action (end held by the hand) from the hemi-space of effect (tool-tip) by presenting them on different sides of space. In the other hand they held one of the tools used in training. For the re-configured tool, SRTs were faster to the side of space in which the tool-tip was expected given the straight tools used in training. Taken together, these findings indicate that the actions properties of hands and tools modulate visuotactile integration.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×