July 2013
Volume 13, Issue 9
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   July 2013
Visual Sensitivity of Frontal Eye Field Neurons During the Preparation of Saccadic Eye Movements
Author Affiliations
  • Rebecca Krock
    Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine
  • Tirin Moore
    Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine\nHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine
Journal of Vision July 2013, Vol.13, 1200. doi:10.1167/13.9.1200
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Rebecca Krock, Tirin Moore; Visual Sensitivity of Frontal Eye Field Neurons During the Preparation of Saccadic Eye Movements. Journal of Vision 2013;13(9):1200. doi: 10.1167/13.9.1200.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Saccadic suppression is a well-characterized psychophysical phenomenon in which visual sensitivity decreases profoundly just before and during saccades. It could play a role in minimizing the perception of self-generated motion signals. The visual responses of neurons before and during saccades have been investigated at numerous stages of the primate visual system, but the relationship between saccadic modulations of visual responses and suppression of psychophysical contrast sensitivity remains unclear. Furthermore, no evidence of a correlate has been observed in the frontal eye field (FEF), which in addition to representing visual information also plays a role in generating saccadic eye movements. To obtain a more direct comparison with psychophysical measurements of saccadic suppression and determine whether a correlate is present in the FEF, we measured not just visual responses but also the contrast sensitivity of neurons in the FEF during the preparation of saccades. We functionally characterized neurons as having visual, visuomovement, or movement activity using a memory-guided saccade task. For cells with visual or visuomovement activity, we recorded responses to brief visual probes (8 ms, full-field, 0.1 cycles/degree sinusoidal gratings ranging from 2% to 32% Michelson contrast). To quantify suppression, we compared the contrast sensitivities measured from contrast-response functions for probes presented long (>100ms) and immediately (<100ms) before saccades. Our results suggest a means by which the representation of visual stimuli in the FEF might account in part for the changes in visual sensitivity that precede saccades.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×