December 2013
Volume 13, Issue 15
Free
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   October 2013
Abnormal preparatory activity in amblyopia: Deficits beyond early visual cortex
Author Notes
  • Footnotes
     Moderators: Vallabh Das & Ruth Manny, University of Houston
  • Footnotes
     Abnormal visual experience has been shown to lead to abnormal development of the neural visual system. This session will go beyond classical work in early cortex to explore the effects of abnormal experience at later stages of processing. It will also address surprising recent insights into manipulation of experience in treatment, both during and beyond the traditional critical period.
Journal of Vision October 2013, Vol.13, T35. doi:10.1167/13.15.35
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Anthony Norcia; Abnormal preparatory activity in amblyopia: Deficits beyond early visual cortex. Journal of Vision 2013;13(15):T35. doi: 10.1167/13.15.35.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Predictable events in the environment allow us to prepare to process upcoming visual inputs (preparatory attention) and motor responses (motor planning). These preparatory signals originate in frontal and parietal areas that send outputs to motor planning areas and to posterior visual structures. Motivated by the fact that frontal and parietal cortex have long developmental sequences, we have been studying simple visual tasks that require control inputs from these areas in patients with a history of amblyopia. High-density EEG recordings, combined with source localization methods were used to study the spatio-temporal distribution of the two forms of preparatory activity. Motor planning and preparatory attention networks were studied in a simple go-no/go task in which the first stimulus (S1) provides a cue as to whether a response to a second stimulus presented 1 sec later might require a response (S2). On half of the trials, S1 indicated that a target would be presented at S2 with 50% probability. Trials of this type induce an expectation of the potential need to respond when S2 is presented. These trials generate a large negative going potential in areas associated with motor planning (the Contingent Negative Variation) as well as slow positive potentials in parietal and occipital cortex. While the magnitude of the motor planning potential was comparable between patients and controls, preparatory attention signals were selectively reduced in patients with amblyopia. The loss of top-down attentional inputs may contribute to previously observed behavioral deficits in amblyopia on tasks that require selective visual attention.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×