August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Asymmetry in Perceived Shape Similarity for Novel Shapes
Author Affiliations
  • Patrick Garrigan
    Saint Joseph's University
  • Katie Binns
    Saint Joseph's University
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 248. doi:10.1167/14.10.248
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Patrick Garrigan, Katie Binns; Asymmetry in Perceived Shape Similarity for Novel Shapes. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):248. doi: 10.1167/14.10.248.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Perceived shape similarity is central to classic problems in vision science, including object recognition and categorization. Here we consider the "transformational" approach, in which similarity is related to the perceived ease with which one shape can be transformed into another. This definition of similarity can account for asymmetries in which, e.g., shape A is perceived as more similar to shape B than shape B is to shape A. Hahn, Close, & Graf (2009) used morphing sequences of familiar objects to show that when transformations from shape A to shape B are made more salient, shape A appears more similar to shape B, but not the reverse. We demonstrate, using a shape-similarity adjustment procedure, similar asymmetries in shape perception for novel, closed, 2D contour shapes. This result shows that the previously reported asymmetries are at least partly related to generic shape perception. Specifically, they show that neither familiar shapes nor shapes with semantic associations are required to induce perceived shape similarity asymmetries. We further illustrate a general mechanism for inducing perceived shape similarity asymmetry through established perceptual and psychophysical results. In our model, shape similarity asymmetries, like those measured in our experiments, may be explained by biases in visual attention (e.g., due to increasing information at regions of high curvature; Attneave, 1954) and the nonlinear relationship between objective and perceived feature magnitude (e.g., the sublinear scaling of perceived curvature magnitude with objective curvature magnitude; Dobson, 1971). In sum, our results suggest that transformational similarity effects may be, at least in part, a consequence of within-object attention (e.g., Garrigan & Hamilton, 2013) and the perceived magnitudes of salient shape features.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×