August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Do hemifield representations co-opt ocular dominance column structure in achiasma?
Author Affiliations
  • Cheryl A. Olman
    Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota
  • Pinglei Bao
    Department of Psychology, University of Southern California
  • Stephen A. Engel
    Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota
  • Andrea N. Grant
    Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota
  • Chris Purington
    Vision Science, University of California, Berkeley
  • Cheng Qiu
    Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota
  • Michael-Paul Schallmo
    Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota
  • Bosco S. Tjan
    Department of Psychology, University of Southern California
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 377. doi:10.1167/14.10.377
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Cheryl A. Olman, Pinglei Bao, Stephen A. Engel, Andrea N. Grant, Chris Purington, Cheng Qiu, Michael-Paul Schallmo, Bosco S. Tjan; Do hemifield representations co-opt ocular dominance column structure in achiasma?. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):377. doi: 10.1167/14.10.377.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

In the absence of an optic chiasm, visual input to the right eye is represented in primary visual cortex (V1) in the right hemisphere, while visual input to the left eye activates only the left hemisphere. Retinotopic mapping reveals that left and right visual hemifield representations are overlaid in V1 in each hemisphere (Hoffman et al., 2012). To explain how overlapping hemifield representations in V1 do not impair vision, we tested the hypothesis (Victor et al., 2000) that visual projections from nasal and temporal retina create interdigitated left and right visual hemifield representations in V1, similar to the ocular dominance columns observed in control subjects. We used high-resolution fMRI at 7T to measure the spatial distribution of responses to left- and right-hemifield stimulation in one achiasmic subject. T2-weighted 2D Spin Echo images were acquired at 0.8 mm isotropic resolution, covering parafoveal regions of V1 (24 slices per 2 sec TR). The left eye was occluded while flickering checkerboards were presented to the right eye. Twelve sec presentations alternated between the left and right visual hemifield, separated by 12 sec mean field presentations. The subject performed a demanding orientation-discrimination task at fixation. A general linear model was used to estimate the responses of voxels in V1 to left- versus right-hemifield stimulation. The spatial distribution of voxels with preference for one hemifield or the other showed interdigitated clusters which densely packed V1 in the right hemisphere. The spatial distribution of hemifield-preference voxels in the achiasmic subject was comparable to the distribution of ocular-dominance voxels in a control subject, measured using standard techniques. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that visual hemifield representations interdigitate in achiasmic V1 following a similar developmental course to that of ocular dominance columns in controls.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×