August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
A kindler, gentler adaptive psychophysical procedure
Author Affiliations
  • Daniel Coates
    Vision Science Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley
  • Susana Chung
    Vision Science Graduate Group, University of California, Berkeley
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 390. doi:10.1167/14.10.390
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Daniel Coates, Susana Chung; A kindler, gentler adaptive psychophysical procedure. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):390. doi: 10.1167/14.10.390.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Despite disadvantages such as inefficient use of trials, the method of constant stimuli remains popular in psychophysical measurement. It is simpler to implement, less taxing on observers, and more immune to lapse errors than adaptive techniques such as staircases or QUEST. The challenge then is to find an optimal set of stimulus levels for each subject in order to estimate a full psychometric function (PF). Efficiency is important when limited trials are available due to time constraints or subject fatigue. We evaluated a hybrid procedure where the testing levels are specified in terms of the mean and spread of a parameterized PF. With only the minimum and maximum stimulus levels detailed beforehand, the PF parameters are estimated online during the testing procedure and guide stimulus placement. Unlike other adaptive methods that eventually repeat testing near the subject's threshold, stimuli are chosen randomly from the specified points on the PF, mitigating expectation bias and subject fatigue. First, using Monte Carlo simulations, we explored optimal stimulus placement for known PFs. We validated previous literature showing that parameters can be estimated equally well with 2-5 carefully placed stimulus locations, with some variation based on the total number of trials. Approximately 100 trials were required to ensure that 95% of the simulations were within 5% of the veridical parameter values. Surprisingly, when the PF was initially unknown and progressively estimated during a simulated run, 100-150 trials were sufficient to reliably converge to the veridical parameter values. Experiments with human observers, including some with significant variability, confirmed that parameter estimation was less accurate when trials remained near subject thresholds, versus those that spread more broadly across the PF. In summary, this method provides a compromise between the flexibility and optimality of adaptive procedures and the simplicity and robustness of the method of constant stimuli.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×