August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Visual Field Coverage of Category-Selective Regions in Human Visual Cortex Estimated Using Population Receptive Field Mapping
Author Affiliations
  • Nathan Witthoft
    Dept of Psychology, Stanford University
  • Mai Nguyen
    Dept of Psychology, New York University
  • Golijeh Golarai
    Dept of Psychology, Stanford University
  • Alina Liberman
    Dept of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley
  • Karen F. LaRocque
    Dept of Psychology, Stanford University
  • Mary E. Smith
    Dept of Psychology, University of California, San Diego
  • Kalanit Grill-Spector
    Dept of Psychology, Stanford University
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 718. doi:10.1167/14.10.718
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Nathan Witthoft, Mai Nguyen, Golijeh Golarai, Alina Liberman, Karen F. LaRocque, Mary E. Smith, Kalanit Grill-Spector; Visual Field Coverage of Category-Selective Regions in Human Visual Cortex Estimated Using Population Receptive Field Mapping . Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):718. doi: 10.1167/14.10.718.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Prior research on the position sensitivity of category selective regions has shown a coupling between face selectivity and foveal representations and place selectivity and sensitivity to the periphery (Levy 2001), as well as decreased tuning to position as one ascends the ventral stream hierarchy (Schwartzlose 2008). However, most studies have examined position sensitivity by comparing discrete locations in the visual field. We extend this prior work by using continuous retinotopic mapping and measuring population receptive fields (pRFs) in category selective regions. 12 subjects participated in an fMRI experiment that contained both a category localizer as well as retinotopic mapping using flickering checkerboard stimuli. By fitting a pRF model to each voxel, we determined the retinal position and the spatial extent of the visual field which best matched the observed BOLD response within each voxel. Then, in each individual brain we defined category-selective ROIs as well as visual field maps. Category-selective ROIs were subdivided by their intersection with visual field maps. Consistent with Aracaro et al 2009, place-selective voxels in the collateral sulcus overlap at least partially with the anterior ventral visual field maps (VO1-2; PHC1-2). pRF fits to these place-selective voxels show large receptive fields that have a strong bias towards the upper visual field and the periphery. By contrast, face-selective ROIs on the ventral surface (IOG-, pFus-, mFus-faces) did not overlap with known visual field maps, but contain pRFs that are foveally centered and their combined coverage of the visual field coverage is generally contained within the central 10째. Interestingly, pRFs in right hemisphere face selective ROIs show greater coverage of the ipsilateral visual field than those on the left, which may be related to the often-reported right hemisphere dominance for face processing in humans.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×