August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
The neural correlate of the polarity advantage effect in crowding
Author Affiliations
  • Ziyun Zhu
    Department of Psychology and Key Laboratory of Machine Perception (Ministry of Education), Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • Fang Fang
    Department of Psychology and Key Laboratory of Machine Perception (Ministry of Education), Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 775. doi:10.1167/14.10.775
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ziyun Zhu, Fang Fang; The neural correlate of the polarity advantage effect in crowding. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):775. doi: 10.1167/14.10.775.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

If the target in a crowding display differs from the flankers in its contrast polarity, the extent of crowding is reduced compared to the condition where the target and flankers have the same polarity. This phenomenon is referred to as the polarity advantage effect. Here, we investigated its neural mechanisms using event-related potentials (ERPs). A target was centered at 8째 eccentricity in the upper-left visual quadrant, either alone or with two adjacent flankers positioned radially. The target and flankers were a circular patch of a sine-wave grating and were presented in a uniform gray background. They were rendered in black or white. They could have the same or opposite polarities. Only in the same polarity condition, there was a significant crowding effect as manifested by orientation discrimination impairment with the target. We measured the earliest ERP component (C1) evoked by five stimulus configurations, including the target only, the target with the flankers of same polarity, the target with the flankers of opposite polarity, the flankers of same polarity only, and the flankers of opposite polarity only. The C1 had a peak latency of about 80 ms and is believed to be generated in early visual cortical areas (i.e. V1 and V2). We found that, the sum of the C1 amplitudes evoked by the target and the flankers was smaller than the C1 amplitude by the target with the flankers, suggesting a mutual cortical suppression between the target and flankers. Importantly, the suppression was significantly stronger when the target and flankers had the same polarity than when they had opposite polarities. We also found that the suppression depended on subjects spatial attention to the stimuli. These results suggest that the early cortical suppression enabled by spatial attention might contribute to the polarity advantage effect in crowding.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×