August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Noise masking of S+ and S- Tests: Linear Cone Combination Model Suggests Detection by Hue Mechanisms
Author Affiliations
  • Rhea T. Eskew, Jr.
    Department of Psychology, Northeastern University
  • Timothy G. Shepard
    Department of Psychology, Northeastern University
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 990. doi:10.1167/14.10.990
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Rhea T. Eskew, Jr., Timothy G. Shepard; Noise masking of S+ and S- Tests: Linear Cone Combination Model Suggests Detection by Hue Mechanisms. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):990. doi: 10.1167/14.10.990.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Psychophysical differences between the detection of S-cone increments and decrements (S+ and S-) were studied using bipolar, dynamic noise masks of several contrast power levels, with a forced-choice method. Noise chromaticities were L, M, and S cone, as well as L-M, L+M, and achromatic (L+M+S). We previously reported (Wang, Guilianini, & Eskew, 2002) that the threshold Energy vs. Noise (EvN) functions differed dramatically for S+ and S- tests. With identical noises, the EvN's for S+ tests are much steeper than those for S- tests (except for achromatic noise) even though the noises consisted of two symmetric chromatic polarities of equal contrast power. The S+/S- differences suggest possible contrast gain differences in S-ON and S-OFF pathways. Here we model the entire set of data (for each of two observers) by combining test energies across all noise chromaticities and powers, separately for S+ and S-. A model in which cone signals are linearly combined to produce mechanism noise power (Giulianini & Eskew, 2007) accounts for the S+ and S- thresholds surprisingly well (r2≥0.89). The fitted relative cone contrast weights are nearly identical in three of the four cases (S+ and S- tests for both observers). In all four cases: (1) the L and M weights are of opposite sign; (2) the M-cone weight is largest in magnitude, larger than the S-cone weight; and (3) the S-cone weight is of the same sign as the L-cone weight. This pattern of relative weights is consistent with detection of these S+ and S- tests being mediated by a classical red-green hue mechanism, one with S cone inputs.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×