August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Head Tilt Delineates Two Mechanisms of the Rod-and-Frame Illusion
Author Affiliations
  • Scott A. Reed
    Department of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon
  • Melissa A. Farley
    Department of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon
  • Paul Dassonville
    Department of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 1098. doi:10.1167/14.10.1098
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Scott A. Reed, Melissa A. Farley, Paul Dassonville; Head Tilt Delineates Two Mechanisms of the Rod-and-Frame Illusion. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):1098. doi: 10.1167/14.10.1098.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The rod-and-frame illusion, in which a tilted frame causes an enclosed line to appear rotated in the direction opposite the frame, is thought to be driven by two separate mechanisms: 1) a visuovestibular distortion in the observer's perception of gravitational vertical, and 2) low-level orientation contrast effects brought about by mutually inhibitory populations of neurons that encode the respective orientations of the rod and frame. However, these two mechanisms are thought to contribute to the overall perceptual phenomenon of the illusion in a graded fashion, with the visuovestibular and orientation contrast effects somewhat stronger with larger and smaller frames, respectively. In past work (e.g., Dassonville & Williamson, VSS 2010), we have devised two sensorimotor tasks to independently measure these effects. The visuovestibular effect was assessed with the saccade-to-vertical task, with participants asked to make a saccade to the topmost point on a response circle contained within the tilted frame. The orientation contrast effect was assessed with the saccade-to-rod task, with participants asked to make a saccade to the point on the response circle intersected by the rod if it were extended upward. In the current experiment, we verified the selectivity of these tasks by having the participants perform with the head tilted, with the expectation that the tilted head would attenuate vestibular cues and thereby cause an enhanced reliance on the visual orientation cues that specifically drive the visuovestibular effect (see Prinzmetal & Beck, 2001). Indeed, head tilt magnified the illusion-related bias in the saccade-to-vertical task (especially with large frames), but had no effect on the magnitude of the bias in the saccade-to-rod task. These findings confirm that these two tasks can successfully isolate the visuovestibular and orientation contrast effects of the rod-and-frame illusion, and provide further evidence that head-tilt magnifies visuovestibular distortions but leaves low-level orientation contrast effects unaffected.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×