August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Estimation of angular velocity of objects differing in material is inconsistent
Author Affiliations
  • Gizem Kucukoglu
    Psychology Department, New York University
  • Laurence T Maloney
    Psychology Department, New York University
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 1319. doi:10.1167/14.10.1319
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Gizem Kucukoglu, Laurence T Maloney; Estimation of angular velocity of objects differing in material is inconsistent. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):1319. doi: 10.1167/14.10.1319.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Previously, we demonstrated that there is an interaction between object surface material and perception of angular velocity (Kucukoglu, Maloney, 2013): specular objects were judged to be moving faster than matte (Lambertian) objects matched in rotational velocity. This year we considered three classes of objects: specular, matte, and matte with albedo surface texture. The stimuli were irregular, blob-like shapes rendered with specular, matte or textured materials. Their angular velocity ranged between 6°/sec to 84°/sec. We had three conditions: (1) textured vs. specular, (2) specular vs. matte and (3) textured vs. matte. In all of these conditions, on a given trial subjects saw a pair of rotating objects – e.g. one specular, one textured – presented one after the other. The task was to pick the faster rotating object in the pair. We used a staircase paradigm to adjust the angular velocity of the objects to the point of subjective equal angular velocity.Three out of four subjects in condition 1 show a significant bias in perceiving textured objects to be faster than the specular objects. Condition two is a repetition of our previous task but this time with slower angular velocities. Two out of four subjects in condition 2 show a bias towards perceiving specular objects to be faster than matte objects. If textured is perceived to be faster than specular (A>B) and specular is faster than matte (B>C) we would expect to find a bias towards perceiving textured to be faster than matte (A>C). However, we do not find any significant bias between textured and matte objects (we do not reject A=C for any subject). We present a cue integration model of estimation of angular velocity proposing that dynamic reweighting of different cues to angular velocity accounts for the observed intransitivity.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.