August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Invariant texture recognition depends on high-order statistics
Author Affiliations
  • Catherine Conlin
    Psychology Dept., North Dakota State University
  • Benjamin Balas
    Psychology Dept., North Dakota State University
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 1424. doi:10.1167/14.10.1424
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Catherine Conlin, Benjamin Balas; Invariant texture recognition depends on high-order statistics. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):1424. doi: 10.1167/14.10.1424.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Texture synthesis models based on joint statistics of wavelet coefficients across scale, orientation, and position have become a popular tool for studying the representations that support texture processing in the human visual system. In particular, the summary statistics implemented in the Portilla-Simoncelli model account for observer performance in crowding, search tasks, and the response properties of V2 neurons. Presently, we chose to investigate whether or not this set of summary statistics was also sufficient to support performance in a texture discrimination task that required invariance to illumination. We selected 14 pairs of visually-matched textures from the Amsterdam Library of Textures, including a diverse range of material properties. Each texture was depicted under two illumination conditions: diffuse overhead lighting and strong side lighting. We generated a synthetic image from each original texture image using the Portilla-Simoncelli model. Using these images, we asked observers (N=13) to complete four match-to-sample tasks. Each task briefly presented (250ms) a sample texture to be matched to one of two test images presented after a 500ms ISI- one test image depicted the same texture as the sample, the other a visually-matched distractor. In the Illumination-change condition, the target texture and the sample were differently illuminated; In the No-change condition, lighting was the same. Observers completed both conditions using real and synthetic textures in separate blocks. We observed significant main effects of real/synthetic appearance (p<0.001) and illumination condition on accuracy (p<0.001), qualified by an interaction between these factors (p<0.001), such that performance in the No-change condition was slightly worse for synthetic textures (~5% cost), but that this difference was much larger in the Illumination-change condition (~20% cost). We conclude that invariant texture recognition relies on statistics not included in the P-S model and natural texture appearance overall leads to better discrimination performance.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×