August 2014
Volume 14, Issue 10
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2014
Eye movements in natural scenes and gaze in the real world.
Author Affiliations
  • Wolfgang Einhäuser
    Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Neurophysics, Marburg, Germany
    Speaker
  • Bernard Marius 't Hart
    Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Neurophysics, Marburg, Germany
    Author
Journal of Vision August 2014, Vol.14, 1446. doi:10.1167/14.10.1446
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Wolfgang Einhäuser, Bernard Marius 't Hart; Eye movements in natural scenes and gaze in the real world.. Journal of Vision 2014;14(10):1446. doi: 10.1167/14.10.1446.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Gaze is widely considered a good proxy for spatial attention. We address whether such "overt attention" is related to other attention measures in natural scenes, and to what extent laboratory results on eye movements transfer to real-world gaze orienting. We find that the probability of a target to be detected in a rapid-serial-visual-presentation task correlates with its probability to be fixated during prolonged viewing, and that both measures are similarly affected by modifications to the target's contrast. This shows a direct link between covert attention in time and overt attention in space for natural stimuli. Especially in the context of computational vision, the probability of an item to be fixated ("salience") is frequently equated with its "importance", the probability of it being recalled during scene description. While we confirm a relation between salience and importance, we dissociate these measures by changing an item's contrast: whereas salience is affected by the actual features, importance is driven by the observer's expectations about these features based on scene statistics. Using a mobile eye-tracking device we demonstrate that eye-tracking experiments in typical laboratory conditions have limited predictive power for real-world gaze orienting. Laboratory data fail to measure the substantial effects of implicit tasks that are imposed on the participant by the environment to avoid severe costs (e.g., tripping over) and typically fail to include the distinct contributions of eye, head and body for orienting gaze. Finally, we provide some examples for applications of mobile gaze-tracking for ergonomic workplace design and aiding medical diagnostics.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×