January 2003
Volume 3, Issue 1
Free
Research Article  |   January 2003
Induced Failures of Visual Awareness
Author Affiliations
  • Daniel J. Simons
    Psychology Department & Beckman Institute, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, USAdsimons@uiuc.edu
  • Ronald A. Rensink
    Departments of Psychology & Computer Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canadarensink@psych.ubc.ca
Journal of Vision January 2003, Vol.3, i. doi:10.1167/3.1.i
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Daniel J. Simons, Ronald A. Rensink; Induced Failures of Visual Awareness. Journal of Vision 2003;3(1):i. doi: 10.1167/3.1.i.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Introduction
Research over the past half century has produced extensive evidence that observers cannot report or retain all of the details of their visual world from one moment to the next. During the past decade, a new set of studies has illustrated just how pervasive these limits are. For example, early evidence for the failure to detect changes to simple dot patterns (Phillips, 1974) and arrays of letters (Pashler, 1988) generalizes to more naturalistic displays such as photographs and motion pictures (e.g., Levin & Simons, 1997; Rensink, O’Regan, & Clark, 1997; see Rensink, 2002 for a recent review). This failure to report changes (change blindness) can be induced in both simple and naturalistic displays, whenever the change co-occurs with a visual disruption such as an eye movement (Currie, McConkie, Carlson-Radvansky, & Irwin, 1995; Hollingworth, Schrock, & Henderson, 2001), image shift (Blackmore, Brelstaff, Nelson, & Troscianko, 1995), flashed blank screen (Rensink et al., 1997), blink (O’Regan, Deubel, Clark, & Rensink, 2000), transient (O’Regan, Rensink, & Clark, 1999; Rensink, O’Regan, & Clark, 2000), movie cut or pan (Levin & Simons, 1997; Simons, 1996), or an occlusion event (Levin, Simons, Angelone, & Chabris, 2002; Simons & Levin, 1998). Change blindness can also occur in the absence of a disruption, provided the change occurs gradually enough that it does not attract attention (Simons, Franconeri, & Reimer, 2000). 
Failures of visual awareness have been induced in a number of ways. For example, observers often fail to report a visible but unexpected stimulus when attention is focused on some other object or event in the display (inattentional blindness). As for change blindness, inattentional blindness occurs for both simple (Mack & Rock, 1998; Most et al., 2001) and naturalistic stimuli (Simons & Chabris, 1999). Similarly, repeated instances of an item often go undetected when embedded in a rapid sequence (repetition blindness), a phenomenon that occurs for both words and pictures (Kanwisher, 1987; Kanwisher & Potter, 1990). Observers can also fail to detect a stimulus in a rapid stream of stimuli provided they had to perform an attention-demanding task shortly before the stimulus appeared (Shapiro, Arnell, & Raymond, 1997). The surprisingly large variety of conditions that induce failures of conscious perception reinforces the broad conclusion that we are often unaware of what would otherwise be fully-visible stimuli. 
Along with an increased appreciation of the limitations of visual awareness has come a renewed interest in using these limitations to explore the nature of the representations and processes underlying our visual experience. Are these limitations due to failures of perception? Of attention? Of memory? What is preserved with and without awareness? 
The papers in this special issue of the Journal of Vision provide examples of exciting new work on induced failures of visual awareness and the mechanisms that underlie them. For example, several papers examine whether observers are drawn to parts of a display by the stimulus features or whether top-down control or semantic comprehension influence search through a display. Others investigate the nature of and limits on the information that is preserved from one view to the next and how much information needs to be retained for effective perception and action. As guest editors, we hope that this special issue will illustrate how studying the relationship between visual awareness and visual representations can lead to important new insights into the nature of seeing. 
References
Blackmore, S. J. Brelstaff, G. Nelson, K. Troscianko, T. (1995). Is the richness of our visual world an illusion? Transsaccadic memory for complex scenes. Perception, 24, 1075–1081. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Currie, C. McConkie, G. W. Carlson-Radvansky, L. A. Irwin, D. E. (1995). Maintaining visual stability across saccades: Role of the saccade target object (Technical Report No. UIUC-BI-HPP-95-01): Beckman Institute, University of Illinois.
Hollingworth, A. Schrock, G. Henderson, J. M. (2001). Change detection in the flicker paradigm: The role of fixation position within the scene. Memory & Cognition, 29, 296–304. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kanwisher, N. (1987). Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition, 27, 117–143. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Kanwisher, N. G. Potter, M. C. (1990). Repetition blindness: Levels of processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(1), 30–47. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Levin, D. T. Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4(4), 501–506. [CrossRef]
Levin, D. T. Simons, D. J. Angelone, B. L. Chabris, C. F. (2002). Memory for centrally attended changing objects in an incidental real-world change detection paradigm. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 289–302. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mack, A. Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Most, S. B. Simons, D. J. Scholl, B. J. Jimenez, R. Clifford, E. Chabris, C. F. (2001). How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science, 12(1), 9–17. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
O’Regan, J. K. Deubel, H. Clark, J. J. Rensink, R. A. (2000). Picture changes during blinks: Looking without seeing and seeing without looking. Visual Cognition, 7, 191–212. [CrossRef]
O’Regan, J. K. Rensink, R. A. Clark, J. J. (1999). Change-blindness as a result of “mudsplashes.” Nature, 398(6722), 34. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception and Psychophysics, 44(4), 369–378. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Phillips, W. A. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 283–290. [CrossRef]
Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 245–277. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rensink, R. A. O’Regan, J. K. Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8(5), 368–373. [CrossRef]
Rensink, R. A. O’Regan, J. K. Clark, J. J. (2000). On the failure to detect changes in scenes cross brief interruptions. Visual Cognition, 7, 127–146. [CrossRef]
Shapiro, K. L. Arnell, K. A. Raymond, J. E. (1997). The attentional blink: A view on attention and a glimpse on consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 291–296. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Simons, D. J. (1996). In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychological Science, 7(5), 301–305. [CrossRef]
Simons, D. J. Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059–1074. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Simons, D. J. Franconeri, S. L. Reimer, R. L. (2000). Change blindness in the absence of a visual disruption. Perception, 29, 1143–1154. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Simons, D. J. Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people in a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5(4), 644–649. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×