December 2002
Volume 2, Issue 10
Free
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Mapping retinal dysfunction in diabetics using the slow flash multifocal electroretinogram
Author Affiliations
  • Marcus A. Bearse, Jr.
    School of Optometry, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
  • Ying Han
    School of Optometry, U.C. Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
  • Marilyn Schneck
    Smith Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Anthony J. Adams
    School of Optometry, U.C. Berkeley, Berkeley, USA
Journal of Vision December 2002, Vol.2, 117. doi:10.1167/2.10.117
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Marcus A. Bearse, Jr., Ying Han, Marilyn Schneck, Anthony J. Adams; Mapping retinal dysfunction in diabetics using the slow flash multifocal electroretinogram. Journal of Vision 2002;2(10):117. doi: 10.1167/2.10.117.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

PURPOSE: The slow flash multifocal electroretinogram (SF-mfERG) stimulates with focal flashes separated by extended dark periods. Compared to standard multifocal stimulation, this permits more complete response development before the next flash and facilitates interpretation of late response components. We wished to determine whether these characteristics enable the SF-mfERG to detect and map diabetic retinal dysfunction. METHODS: Eighteen controls, 12 diabetics without retinopathy (D), and 17 diabetics with mild retinopathy (D+R; predominantly microaneurisms) were tested using VERIS 4. 103 areas of the central 45 deg were stimulated pseudorandomly by flashes (100 cd/m2) separated by at least 53 ms. First order SF-mfERGs were examined in two ways. First, mean responses were computed for each subject in 6 groups concentric with fixation and N1, P1 and N2 implicit times (ITs) and N1, N1-P1, and N2 amplitudes were measured. Second, each subject's N1, P1 and N2 ITs and scalar product amplitudes (SPAs) were measured at all 103 locations. Abnormalities were defined as p<=0.05 and as local values >= 2 Z-scores from controls. RESULTS: [1. Concentric response groups] Abnormal ITs occurred in D+R subjects in N1 (2/6 groups), P1 (4/6) and N2 (5/6). Abnormal amplitudes were obtained for the D+R subjects in 17 of 18 measures. For D subjects, the primary abnormality was P1 IT (4/6 groups); amplitudes were normal. [2. Individual SF-mfERGs] In D+R subjects, N2 ITs were most frequently abnormal. IT abnormalities occurred most frequently beyond 7 deg eccentricity. SPA abnormalities occurred most frequently for D and D+R subjects in the inferior nasal retina. CONCLUSIONS: The SF-mfERG is sensitive to mild diabetic retinopathy. It also detects abnormalities in diabetics without retinopathy. The implicit time of N2 may be the most sensitive parameter for mapping diabetic retinal dysfunction.

Bearse, M. A.Jr., Han, Y., Schneck, M. E., Adams, A. J.(2002). Mapping retinal dysfunction in diabetics using the slow flash multifocal electroretinogram [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2( 10): 117, 117a, http://journalofvision.org/2/10/117/, doi:10.1167/2.10.117. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×