December 2002
Volume 2, Issue 10
Free
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Color discrimination, color constancy and natural scene statistics
Author Affiliations
  • Don MacLeod
    Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Journal of Vision December 2002, Vol.2, 15. doi:10.1167/2.10.15
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Don MacLeod; Color discrimination, color constancy and natural scene statistics. Journal of Vision 2002;2(10):15. doi: 10.1167/2.10.15.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Does the visual system allocate discriminative ability to different regions in colour space in a way that optimizes discrimination among natural colours? If so, discrimination should satisfy a “cube root rule”: in an optimized system differential sensitivity will be greatest for the most commonly encountered conditions, dropping to half its maximum under conditions of relative frequency 1/8. The fit between this principle and psychophysical observation is improved by considering the stimulus to be the local contrast between test field and background, rather than absolute pixel values. Comparison with physiological data shows less satisfactory agreement: M cells appear to be too nonlinear, and P cells too linear, for optimal metric representations of luminance and colour respectively.

For natural colours under natural illuminants, the cone excitations for all surfaces in an image are scaled by approximately the same factor with a change of illumination. This allows the effect of varying illumination to be simply corrected by reciprocal adjustments of sensitivity in the different cone types. The resulting representation is illumination-invariant, but also fails to preserve information about the overall chromatic cast of a scene. Experimentally this is sometimes inaccurately estimated, in “underconstancy”. When the statistical variation among natural illuminants and scenes is considered, underconstancy can be viewed not as a failure of constancy, but as a best guess about illuminant colour appropriately based on knowledge of relevant environmental statistics.

Statistics (other than the mean) of the distribution of an image's elements in cone excitation space can in principle resolve the ambiguity inherent in the mean alone. Experiment suggests that vision does exploit these cues.and gives them statistically justifiable weight.

MacLeod, D.(2002). Color discrimination, color constancy and natural scene statistics [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2( 10): 15, 15a, http://journalofvision.org/2/10/15/, doi:10.1167/2.10.15. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×