December 2002
Volume 2, Issue 10
Free
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   December 2002
Principles of surface reconstruction
Author Affiliations
  • Christopher W. Tyler
    Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Lora T. Likova
    The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
  • Heidi A. Baseler
    Smith-Kettleweell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, USA
Journal of Vision December 2002, Vol.2, 72. doi:10.1167/2.10.72
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christopher W. Tyler, Lora T. Likova, Heidi A. Baseler; Principles of surface reconstruction. Journal of Vision 2002;2(10):72. doi: 10.1167/2.10.72.

      Download citation file:


      © 2016 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The classic model of depth processing is of depth tokens added to a 2D map of the spatial layout, forming the “2 1/2 D” sketch of the 3D scene (Marr, 1982). An alternative view is that spatial reconstruction operates by a primordial 3D surface reconstruction that, conversely, embeds the information for spatial layout (Tyler, 1995, Perception). On this latter concept, the multicue surface map contains the only visual localization information (beyond relative phase and orientation cues from local neural filters). These models can be compared by measuring localization ability in stimuli with the depth nulled by opposing disparity against monocular depth cues. If depth is merely an auxiliary variable of the 2 1/2 D sketch, nulling it should not affect localization ability. If the 3D surface map is the inherent substrate of perceptual representation, however, nulling the depth should obliterate the ability to localize targets. Localization of Gaussian profiles sampled at 16′ intervals showed a profound inability to discriminate their location at the depth null point. Moreover, localization based on disparity cues was far better than based on luminance cues alone. These results imply that true localization derives from the depth map rather than in the luminance array, and that Vernier and other high-resolution localization tasks are local luminance discriminations of orientation or phase.

Beyond the primacy of disparity cues, the depth null implies that the contributary depth cues innervate a unitary 3D surface map. Evidence from our own and other fMRI studies suggests that this 3D representation is localized on the lateral surface of the occipital lobe, near the inferior occipital gyrus, originally designated LO by Malach et al. (1995, PNAS) from a 3D-pictures / flat-texture contrast. Activation from the processing of other object properties (structure, symmetry, motion, affordance) occurs separately in more anterior brain areas.

Tyler, C. W., Likova, L. T., Baseler, H. A.(2002). Principles of surface reconstruction [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2( 10): 72, 72a, http://journalofvision.org/2/10/72/, doi:10.1167/2.10.72. [CrossRef]
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×